These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


199 related items for PubMed ID: 20050399

  • 1. Universal Protocol becomes less prescriptive in its 2010 version.
    OR Manager; 2009 Dec; 25(12):1, 6-7. PubMed ID: 20050399
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Universal Protocol won't change for now.
    OR Manager; 2007 Aug; 23(8):5. PubMed ID: 17824509
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Wrong site surgery and the Universal Protocol.
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 2006 Nov; 91(11):63. PubMed ID: 18557441
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Minnesota takes extra steps on wrong surgery, retained items.
    OR Manager; 2005 Apr; 21(4):1, 18-20. PubMed ID: 15909366
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Preoperative communication to improve safety: a literature review.
    Penprase B, Elstun L, Ferguson C, Schaper M, Tiller C.
    Nurs Manage; 2010 Nov; 41(11):18-24; quiz 24-5. PubMed ID: 20966789
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Revisiting the universal protocol.
    Banschbach SK.
    AORN J; 2009 Feb; 89(2):257-9. PubMed ID: 19200460
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Implementing the universal protocol.
    Watson DS.
    AORN J; 2009 Aug; 90(2):283-7. PubMed ID: 19664421
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. JCAHO's universal protocol released to widespread endorsement.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Feb; 24(2):1-4. PubMed ID: 14994461
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Who should mark the surgical site?
    OR Manager; 2004 Jan; 20(1):7. PubMed ID: 14740470
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Approved: revisions to 2007 National Patient Safety Goals and Universal Protocol.
    Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 2007 Mar; 27(3):5-6. PubMed ID: 17416142
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Auditing and improving the sponge count process.
    Farrell V, Higbie V, Cleveland S.
    OR Manager; 2003 Mar; 19(3):13-4. PubMed ID: 12661500
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Marking the site for spinal surgery.
    OR Manager; 2004 Jan; 20(1):9. PubMed ID: 14740472
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Handoffs: lessons from other industries.
    Patterson E.
    OR Manager; 2005 Aug; 21(8):11-2. PubMed ID: 16146178
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Patient safety. A prescription for certainty: a new wrong site surgery protocol.
    Larson L.
    Trustee; 2004 Apr; 57(4):30-1. PubMed ID: 15119064
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Sentinel events.
    Watson DS.
    AORN J; 2009 Dec; 90(6):926-9. PubMed ID: 19961981
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Using safety tools to prevent system-related errors.
    Voight PE.
    AORN J; 2009 Jun; 89(6):969-70. PubMed ID: 19500696
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Medical errors: root cause analysis.
    Spath P.
    OR Manager; 1998 Sep; 14(9):38, 40-1. PubMed ID: 10185635
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Timeout: it's as easy as apple pie!
    Bennett C.
    OR Manager; 2007 Jul; 23(7):14. PubMed ID: 17708193
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.