These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

153 related items for PubMed ID: 20054289

  • 1. SCORE should be preferred to Framingham to predict cardiovascular death in French population.
    Marchant I, Boissel JP, Kassaï B, Bejan T, Massol J, Vidal C, Amsallem E, Naudin F, Galan P, Czernichow S, Nony P, Gueyffier F.
    Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil; 2009 Oct; 16(5):609-15. PubMed ID: 20054289
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Performance of Framingham cardiovascular risk scores by ethnic groups in New Zealand: PREDICT CVD-10.
    Riddell T, Wells S, Jackson R, Lee AW, Crengle S, Bramley D, Ameratunga S, Pylypchuk R, Broad J, Marshall R, Kerr A.
    N Z Med J; 2010 Feb 19; 123(1309):50-61. PubMed ID: 20186242
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Recalibration and validation of the SCORE risk chart in the Australian population: the AusSCORE chart.
    Chen L, Tonkin AM, Moon L, Mitchell P, Dobson A, Giles G, Hobbs M, Phillips PJ, Shaw JE, Simmons D, Simons LA, Fitzgerald AP, De Backer G, De Bacquer D.
    Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil; 2009 Oct 19; 16(5):562-70. PubMed ID: 19741542
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Evaluation of cardiovascular risk predicted by different SCORE equations: the Netherlands as an example.
    van Dis I, Kromhout D, Geleijnse JM, Boer JM, Verschuren WM.
    Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil; 2010 Apr 19; 17(2):244-9. PubMed ID: 20195155
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Estimation of cardiovascular risk: a comparison between the Framingham and the SCORE model in people under 60 years of age.
    Scheltens T, Verschuren WM, Boshuizen HC, Hoes AW, Zuithoff NP, Bots ML, Grobbee DE.
    Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil; 2008 Oct 19; 15(5):562-6. PubMed ID: 18756178
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Fewer deaths from cardiovascular disease than expected from the Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation chart in a Swedish population.
    Stenlund H, Lönnberg G, Jenkins P, Norberg M, Persson M, Messner T, Boman K, Pearson T, Wall S, Nyström L, Weinehall L.
    Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil; 2009 Jun 19; 16(3):321-4. PubMed ID: 19357519
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A consultation-based method is equal to SCORE and an extensive laboratory-based method in predicting risk of future cardiovascular disease.
    Petersson U, Ostgren CJ, Brudin L, Nilsson PM.
    Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil; 2009 Oct 19; 16(5):536-40. PubMed ID: 19357517
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Predictive accuracy and usefulness of calibration of the ESC SCORE in Switzerland.
    Marques-Vidal P, Rodondi N, Bochud M, Pécoud A, Hayoz D, Paccaud F, Mooser V, Waeber G, Vollenweider P.
    Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil; 2008 Aug 19; 15(4):402-8. PubMed ID: 18677163
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Framingham Heart Study risk equation predicts first cardiovascular event rates in New Zealanders at the population level.
    Milne R, Gamble G, Whitlock G, Jackson R.
    N Z Med J; 2003 Nov 07; 116(1185):U662. PubMed ID: 14615804
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The predictive value of cardiorespiratory fitness combined with coronary risk evaluation and the risk of cardiovascular and all-cause death.
    Laukkanen JA, Rauramaa R, Salonen JT, Kurl S.
    J Intern Med; 2007 Aug 07; 262(2):263-72. PubMed ID: 17645594
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Central obesity and multivariable cardiovascular risk as assessed by the Framingham prediction scores.
    Dhaliwal SS, Welborn TA.
    Am J Cardiol; 2009 May 15; 103(10):1403-7. PubMed ID: 19427436
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Validation of two Framingham cardiovascular risk prediction algorithms in an Australian population: the 'old' versus the 'new' Framingham equation.
    Zomer E, Owen A, Magliano DJ, Liew D, Reid C.
    Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil; 2011 Feb 15; 18(1):115-20. PubMed ID: 20473180
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Evaluation of a recalibrated Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation cardiovascular risk chart: results from Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation Germany.
    Hense HW, Koesters E, Wellmann J, Meisinger C, Völzke H, Keil U.
    Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil; 2008 Aug 15; 15(4):409-15. PubMed ID: 18677164
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.