These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. A comparison in proximal tibial strain between metal-backed and all-polyethylene anatomic graduated component total knee arthroplasty tibial components. Small SR, Berend ME, Ritter MA, Buckley CA. J Arthroplasty; 2010 Aug; 25(5):820-5. PubMed ID: 20638615 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. All-polyethylene and metal-backed tibias have similar outcomes at 10 years: a randomized level I [corrected] evidence study. Gioe TJ, Stroemer ES, Santos ER. Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Feb; 455():212-8. PubMed ID: 17006363 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Experience with an all-polyethylene total knee arthroplasty in younger, active patients with follow-up from 2 to 11 years. Ranawat AS, Mohanty SS, Goldsmith SE, Rasquinha VJ, Rodriguez JA, Ranawat CS. J Arthroplasty; 2005 Oct; 20(7 Suppl 3):7-11. PubMed ID: 16213996 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. All-polyethylene vs. metal-backed tibial component in total knee arthroplasty-a randomized RSA study comparing early fixation of horizontally and completely cemented tibial components: part 1. Horizontally cemented components: AP better fixated than MB. Hyldahl H, Regnér L, Carlsson L, Kärrholm J, Weidenhielm L. Acta Orthop; 2005 Dec; 76(6):769-77. PubMed ID: 16470428 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]