These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

121 related items for PubMed ID: 20060749

  • 1. Complication rates and outcomes of 536 implanted subcutaneous chest ports: do rates differ based on the primary operator's level of training?
    Silas AM, Perrich KD, Hoffer EK, McNulty NJ.
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Apr; 17(4):464-7. PubMed ID: 20060749
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Complication rate of venous access procedures performed by a radiology practitioner assistant compared with interventional radiology physicians and supervised trainees.
    Benham JR, Culp WC, Wright LB, McCowan TC.
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2007 Aug; 18(8):1001-4. PubMed ID: 17675618
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Radiologic placement of a low profile implantable venous access port in a pediatric population.
    Nosher JL, Bodner LJ, Ettinger LJ, Siegel RL, Gribbin C, Asch J, Drachtman RA.
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2001 Aug; 24(6):395-9. PubMed ID: 11907746
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Risk of thrombosis and infections of central venous catheters and totally implanted access ports in patients treated for cancer.
    Beckers MM, Ruven HJ, Seldenrijk CA, Prins MH, Biesma DH.
    Thromb Res; 2010 Apr; 125(4):318-21. PubMed ID: 19640573
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Implantable subcutaneous venous access devices: is port fixation necessary? A review of 534 cases.
    McNulty NJ, Perrich KD, Silas AM, Linville RM, Forauer AR.
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2010 Aug; 33(4):751-5. PubMed ID: 19957181
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Central venous access ports placed by interventional radiologists: experience with 125 consecutive patients.
    Lorch H, Zwaan M, Kagel C, Weiss HD.
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2001 Aug; 24(3):180-4. PubMed ID: 11443406
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. An 11-year retrospective study of totally implanted central venous access ports: complications and patient satisfaction.
    Ignatov A, Hoffman O, Smith B, Fahlke J, Peters B, Bischoff J, Costa SD.
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2009 Mar; 35(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 18329836
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Subcutaneously implanted central venous access devices in cancer patients: a prospective analysis.
    Schwarz RE, Groeger JS, Coit DG.
    Cancer; 1997 Apr 15; 79(8):1635-40. PubMed ID: 9118051
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. "Blind" placement of long-term central venous access devices: report of 589 consecutive procedures.
    Kincaid EH, Davis PW, Chang MC, Fenstermaker JM, Pennell TC.
    Am Surg; 1999 Jun 15; 65(6):520-3; discussion 523-4. PubMed ID: 10366205
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A prospective randomized trial demonstrating valved implantable ports have fewer complications and lower overall cost than nonvalved implantable ports.
    Carlo JT, Lamont JP, McCarty TM, Livingston S, Kuhn JA.
    Am J Surg; 2004 Dec 15; 188(6):722-7. PubMed ID: 15619490
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. A comparison of clinical outcomes with regular- and low-profile totally implanted central venous port systems.
    Teichgräber UK, Streitparth F, Cho CH, Benter T, Gebauer B.
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2009 Sep 15; 32(5):975-9. PubMed ID: 19085032
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Chest port placement with use of the single-incision insertion technique.
    Charles HW, Miguel T, Kovacs S, Gohari A, Arampulikan J, McCann JW.
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2009 Nov 15; 20(11):1464-9. PubMed ID: 19875065
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Factors predicting subcutaneous implanted central venous port function: the relationship between catheter tip location and port failure in patients with gynecologic malignancies.
    Cohn DE, Mutch DG, Rader JS, Farrell M, Awantang R, Herzog TJ.
    Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Dec 15; 83(3):533-6. PubMed ID: 11733967
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Peripheral ports are a new option for central venous access.
    Schuman E, Ragsdale J.
    J Am Coll Surg; 1995 Apr 15; 180(4):456-60. PubMed ID: 7719550
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [The fluoroscopy-guided implantation of subcutaneous venous ports: the complications and long-term results].
    Kluge A, Stroh H, Wagner D, Rauber K.
    Rofo; 1998 Jul 15; 169(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 9711285
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Peripherally-placed central venous access ports: clinical and laboratory observations.
    Johnson JA, Didlake RH.
    Am Surg; 1994 Dec 15; 60(12):915-9. PubMed ID: 7992964
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Subcutaneous chamber systems (ports) for long-term care in cancer patients].
    Hájek R, Sevcík P, Ondrásek J, Mayer J, Vásová I, Král Z, Tomíska M, Krahulcová E, Penka M, Kubesová H.
    Vnitr Lek; 1995 Jan 15; 41(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 7716888
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Insertion and management of long-term central venous devices: role of radiologic imaging techniques].
    Capaccioli L, Nistri M, Distante V, Rontini M, Manetti A, Stecco A.
    Radiol Med; 1998 Oct 15; 96(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 9972217
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Technical benefits and outcomes of modified upwardly created subcutaneous chest pockets for placing central venous ports: single-center experience.
    Lee SH, Chun HJ, Choi BG.
    Acta Radiol; 2009 May 15; 50(4):368-73. PubMed ID: 19267272
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.