These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

253 related items for PubMed ID: 2006265

  • 1. Spectral dependence of glandular tissue dose in screen-film mammography.
    Wu X, Barnes GT, Tucker DM.
    Radiology; 1991 Apr; 179(1):143-8. PubMed ID: 2006265
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Normalized average glandular dose in molybdenum target-rhodium filter and rhodium target-rhodium filter mammography.
    Wu X, Gingold EL, Barnes GT, Tucker DM.
    Radiology; 1994 Oct; 193(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 8090926
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Average glandular dose conversion coefficients for segmented breast voxel models.
    Zankl M, Fill U, Hoeschen C, Panzer W, Regulla D.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005 Oct; 114(1-3):410-4. PubMed ID: 15933148
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Contrast and dose with Mo-Mo, Mo-Rh, and Rh-Rh target-filter combinations in mammography.
    Gingold EL, Wu X, Barnes GT.
    Radiology; 1995 Jun; 195(3):639-44. PubMed ID: 7753987
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Absorbed radiation dose in mammography.
    Hammerstein GR, Miller DW, White DR, Masterson ME, Woodard HQ, Laughlin JS.
    Radiology; 1979 Feb; 130(2):485-91. PubMed ID: 760167
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Determination of average glandular dose with modern mammography units for two large groups of patients.
    Klein R, Aichinger H, Dierker J, Jansen JT, Joite-Barfuss S, Säbel M, Schulz-Wendtland R, Zoetelief J.
    Phys Med Biol; 1997 Apr; 42(4):651-71. PubMed ID: 9127443
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Monte Carlo generated conversion factors for the estimation of average glandular dose in contact and magnification mammography.
    Koutalonis M, Delis H, Spyrou G, Costaridou L, Tzanakos G, Panayiotakis G.
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov 07; 51(21):5539-48. PubMed ID: 17047268
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Average glandular dose in routine mammography screening using a Sectra MicroDose Mammography unit.
    Hemdal B, Herrnsdorf L, Andersson I, Bengtsson G, Heddson B, Olsson M.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005 Nov 07; 114(1-3):436-43. PubMed ID: 15933152
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.