These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

253 related items for PubMed ID: 2006265

  • 21. [Average glandular tissue dose and image quality in screen-film mammography].
    Kohama C, Yoshida A, Kodera Y.
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2004 Sep; 60(9):1332-9. PubMed ID: 15459570
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Influence of anode/filter material and tube potential on contrast, signal-to-noise ratio and average absorbed dose in mammography: a Monte Carlo study.
    Dance DR, Thilander AK, Sandborg M, Skinner CL, Castellano IA, Carlsson GA.
    Br J Radiol; 2000 Oct; 73(874):1056-67. PubMed ID: 11271898
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Absorbed breast dose: dependence on radiographic modality and technique, and breast thickness.
    Skubic SE, Fatouros PP.
    Radiology; 1986 Oct; 161(1):263-70. PubMed ID: 3763877
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Real-time estimation system for mean glandular dose in mammography.
    Matsumoto M, Inoue S, Honda I, Yamamoto S, Ueguchi T, Ogata Y, Johkoh T.
    Radiat Med; 2003 Oct; 21(6):280-4. PubMed ID: 14743903
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Entrance skin exposure and mean glandular dose: effect of scatter and field gradient at mammography.
    Ng KH, Aus RJ, DeWerd LA, Vetter JR.
    Radiology; 1997 Nov; 205(2):395-8. PubMed ID: 9356619
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Average glandular dose with amorphous silicon full-field digital mammography - Clinical results.
    Hermann KP, Obenauer S, Marten K, Kehbel S, Fischer U, Grabbe E.
    Rofo; 2002 Jun; 174(6):696-9. PubMed ID: 12063597
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. [An improved method for determining the mean parenchyma dose in mammography].
    Klein R, Aichinger H, Joite-Barfuss S, Säbel M, Schulz-Wendtland R.
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1995 Nov; 5(6):394-7. PubMed ID: 8580142
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Dose to population as a metric in the design of optimised exposure control in digital mammography.
    Klausz R, Shramchenko N.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005 Nov; 114(1-3):369-74. PubMed ID: 15933139
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Contrast-to-noise ratio in magnification mammography: a Monte Carlo study.
    Koutalonis M, Delis H, Spyrou G, Costaridou L, Tzanakos G, Panayiotakis G.
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jun 07; 52(11):3185-99. PubMed ID: 17505097
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Normalized glandular dose coefficients for digital breast tomosynthesis systems with a homogeneous breast model.
    Sarno A, Tucciariello RM, Mettivier G, Del Sarto D, Fantacci ME, Russo P.
    Phys Med Biol; 2021 Mar 12; 66(6):065024. PubMed ID: 33535193
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Dose comparison between screen/film and full-field digital mammography.
    Gennaro G, di Maggio C.
    Eur Radiol; 2006 Nov 12; 16(11):2559-66. PubMed ID: 16733678
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Monte Carlo simulation of average glandular dose and an investigation of influencing factors.
    Nigapruke K, Puwanich P, Phaisangittisakul N, Youngdee W.
    J Radiat Res; 2010 Nov 12; 51(4):441-8. PubMed ID: 20523013
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. A comparison of fixed and variable kVp technique protocols for film-screen mammography.
    McParland BJ, Boyd MM.
    Br J Radiol; 2000 Jun 12; 73(870):613-26. PubMed ID: 10911785
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Glandularity and mean glandular dose determined for individual women at four regional breast cancer screening units in the Netherlands.
    Zoetelief J, Veldkamp WJ, Thijssen MA, Jansen JT.
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Apr 07; 51(7):1807-17. PubMed ID: 16552106
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. [A computerized manual for assessing the dosage absorbed by breast tissue in mammography].
    Bagni B, Pedrazzini L.
    Radiol Med; 1988 Nov 07; 76(5):479-85. PubMed ID: 3060905
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Monte Carlo simulation for correlation analysis of average glandular dose by breast thickness and glandular ratio in breast tissue.
    Kim ST, Cho JK.
    Technol Health Care; 2014 Nov 07; 22(3):345-50. PubMed ID: 24704647
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Evaluation of radiation dose, focal spot, and automatic exposure of newer film-screen mammography units.
    Kimme-Smith C, Bassett LW, Gold RH.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1987 Nov 07; 149(5):913-7. PubMed ID: 3499794
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Breast composition and radiographic breast equivalence.
    McLean D.
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1997 Mar 07; 20(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 9141308
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.