These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

68 related items for PubMed ID: 20069370

  • 1. Estimating the parameter distributions of defibrillation shock efficacy curves in a large population.
    Smits K, Virag N.
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2010 Apr; 38(4):1314-25. PubMed ID: 20069370
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Impact of defibrillation test protocol and test repetition on the probability of meeting implant criteria.
    Smits K, Virag N.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2011 Nov; 34(11):1515-26. PubMed ID: 21797895
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Inductionless or limited shock testing is possible in most patients with implantable cardioverter- defibrillators/cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators: results of the multicenter ASSURE Study (Arrhythmia Single Shock Defibrillation Threshold Testing Versus Upper Limit of Vulnerability: Risk Reduction Evaluation With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantations).
    Day JD, Doshi RN, Belott P, Birgersdotter-Green U, Behboodikhah M, Ott P, Glatter KA, Tobias S, Frumin H, Lee BK, Merillat J, Wiener I, Wang S, Grogin H, Chun S, Patrawalla R, Crandall B, Osborn JS, Weiss JP, Lappe DL, Neuman S.
    Circulation; 2007 May 08; 115(18):2382-9. PubMed ID: 17470697
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Using the upper limit of vulnerability to assess defibrillation efficacy at implantation of ICDs.
    Swerdlow CD, Shehata M, Chen PS.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 Feb 08; 30(2):258-70. PubMed ID: 17338725
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Effects of shock polarity reversal on defibrillation threshold in an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.
    Zienciuk A, Lubiński A, Królak T, Lewicka-Nowak E, Kempa M, Pazdyga A, Raczak G.
    Kardiol Pol; 2007 May 08; 65(5):495-500; discussion 501-2. PubMed ID: 17577846
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Approximate solution to the bidomain equations for defibrillation problems.
    Patel SG, Roth BJ.
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2005 Feb 08; 71(2 Pt 1):021908. PubMed ID: 15783353
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Experimental verification of theoretical predictions concerning the optimum defibrillation waveform.
    Malkin RA, Jackson SR, Nguyen J, Yang Z, Guan D.
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Aug 08; 53(8):1492-8. PubMed ID: 16916083
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Predictors of successful defibrillation threshold test during CRT-D implantation.
    Przybylski A, Oreziak A, Lewandowski Z, Hasiec A, Orczykowski M, Walczak F.
    Kardiol Pol; 2010 May 08; 68(5):512-8. PubMed ID: 20491010
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Is defibrillation testing still necessary? A decision analysis and Markov model.
    Gula LJ, Massel D, Krahn AD, Yee R, Skanes AC, Klein GJ.
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2008 Apr 08; 19(4):400-5. PubMed ID: 18298512
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Upper limit of vulnerability is a good estimator of shock strength associated with 90% probability of successful defibrillation in humans with transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.
    Swerdlow CD, Ahern T, Kass RM, Davie S, Mandel WJ, Chen PS.
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1996 Apr 08; 27(5):1112-8. PubMed ID: 8609329
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Finite element analysis of cardiac defibrillation current distributions.
    Sepulveda NG, Wikswo JP, Echt DS.
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1990 Apr 08; 37(4):354-65. PubMed ID: 2338348
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Image based modeling of defibrillation in children.
    Jolley M, Triedman J, Westin CF, Weinstein DM, MacLeod R, Brooks D.
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006 Apr 08; 2006():2564-7. PubMed ID: 17946966
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Patient-specific computational analysis of transvenous defibrillation: a comparison to clinical metrics in humans.
    Mocanu D, Kettenbach J, Sweeney MO, Kikinis R, Kenknight BH, Eisenberg SR.
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2004 Jun 08; 32(6):775-83. PubMed ID: 15255208
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Modified alternating current defibrillation: a new defibrillation technique.
    Rosenheck S, Gorni S, Katz I, Rabin A, Shpoliansky U, Mandelbaum M, Weiss AT.
    Europace; 2009 Feb 08; 11(2):239-44. PubMed ID: 19168498
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A comparison of defibrillation efficacy between different impedance compensation techniques in high impedance porcine model.
    Li Y, Ristagno G, Yu T, Bisera J, Weil MH, Tang W.
    Resuscitation; 2009 Nov 08; 80(11):1312-7. PubMed ID: 19720442
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Defibrillation testing during implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation in Italian current practice: the Assessment of Long-term Induction clinical ValuE (ALIVE) project.
    Stefano B, Pietro RR, Maurizio G, Maurizio L, Renato M, Maurizio L, Pietro R, Alessandro P, Gianluca B, Monica M, Sergio C, Massimo S.
    Am Heart J; 2011 Aug 08; 162(2):390-7. PubMed ID: 21835302
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Estimating the 95% effective defibrillation dose.
    Malkin RA, Burdick DS, Johnson EE, Pilkington TC, Swanson DK, Ideker RE.
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1993 Mar 08; 40(3):256-65. PubMed ID: 8335329
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. BIPHASIC Trial: a randomized comparison of fixed lower versus escalating higher energy levels for defibrillation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
    Stiell IG, Walker RG, Nesbitt LP, Chapman FW, Cousineau D, Christenson J, Bradford P, Sookram S, Berringer R, Lank P, Wells GA.
    Circulation; 2007 Mar 27; 115(12):1511-7. PubMed ID: 17353443
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Multicenter study of principles-based waveforms for external defibrillation.
    Bain AC, Swerdlow CD, Love CJ, Ellenbogen KA, Deering TF, Brewer JE, Augostini RS, Tchou PJ.
    Ann Emerg Med; 2001 Jan 27; 37(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 11145764
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A comparison of biventricular and conventional transvenous defibrillation: a computational study using patient derived models.
    Mocanu D, Kettenbach J, Sweeney MO, Kikinis R, Kenknight BH, Eisenberg SR.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2004 May 27; 27(5):586-93. PubMed ID: 15125713
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 4.