These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

253 related items for PubMed ID: 20077321

  • 1. The pitfalls of deducing ethics from behavioral economics: why the Association of American Medical Colleges is wrong about pharmaceutical detailing.
    Huddle TS.
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jan; 10(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 20077321
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Response to open peer commentaries on "The pitfalls of deducing ethics from economics: why the Association of American Medical Colleges is wrong about pharmaceutical detailing".
    Huddle TS.
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jan; 10(1):W1-3. PubMed ID: 20077322
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The AAMC exhibits the behavior it condemns.
    Stossel TP.
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jan; 10(1):26-7. PubMed ID: 20077333
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Contact with pharmaceutical representatives: where does prudence lead?
    Appelbaum PS.
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jan; 10(1):11-3. PubMed ID: 20077326
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The pitfalls of misreading: what does "industry funding of medical education" actually say?
    Spielman B.
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jan; 10(1):24-5. PubMed ID: 20077332
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The devil in the detail(ing).
    Morreim H.
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jan; 10(1):15-7. PubMed ID: 20077328
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Drug detailers, professionalism, and prudence.
    Brody H.
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jan; 10(1):9-10. PubMed ID: 20077325
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Huddle gets it right, most docs don't.
    Rubin PH.
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jan; 10(1):17-9. PubMed ID: 20077329
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Drug reps and the academic medical center: a case for management rather than prohibition.
    Huddle TS.
    Perspect Biol Med; 2008 Jan; 51(2):251-60. PubMed ID: 18453729
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. On the need for probity when physicians interact with industry.
    Scott IA.
    Intern Med J; 2006 Apr; 36(4):265-9. PubMed ID: 16640747
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The ethics of pharmaceutical industry gift-giving: the role of a professional association.
    Morin K, Morse LJ.
    Am J Bioeth; 2003 Apr; 3(3):54-5. PubMed ID: 14594494
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Doctors and the drug industry: reader feedback.
    Warrier R, Houghton B.
    Am J Med; 2005 Oct; 118(10):1175-6; author reply 1176. PubMed ID: 16194656
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Medicine and the pharmaceutical industry: a call to action.
    Stiles MM, Barrett B.
    Am Fam Physician; 2007 May 15; 75(10):1447, 1451; discussion 1451. PubMed ID: 17555137
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Who pays for the pizza? Redefining the relationships between doctors and drug companies. 1: entanglement.
    Moynihan R.
    BMJ; 2003 May 31; 326(7400):1189-92. PubMed ID: 12775621
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Banning pens and pads misses the main point.
    Terry SF, Burke W.
    Am J Bioeth; 2003 May 31; 3(3):63-5. PubMed ID: 14594500
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.