These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


525 related items for PubMed ID: 20078762

  • 1. A primer on classical test theory and item response theory for assessments in medical education.
    De Champlain AF.
    Med Educ; 2010 Jan; 44(1):109-17. PubMed ID: 20078762
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Post-examination interpretation of objective test data: monitoring and improving the quality of high-stakes examinations: AMEE Guide No. 66.
    Tavakol M, Dennick R.
    Med Teach; 2012 Jan; 34(3):e161-75. PubMed ID: 22364473
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Item response theory test equating in health sciences education.
    Guilera G, Gómez J.
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2008 Mar; 13(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 16847729
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The value of item response theory in clinical assessment: a review.
    Thomas ML.
    Assessment; 2011 Sep; 18(3):291-307. PubMed ID: 20644081
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Item response theory: applications of modern test theory in medical education.
    Downing SM.
    Med Educ; 2003 Aug; 37(8):739-45. PubMed ID: 12945568
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Classical test theory.
    DeVellis RF.
    Med Care; 2006 Nov; 44(11 Suppl 3):S50-9. PubMed ID: 17060836
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Using classical test theory, item response theory, and Rasch measurement theory to evaluate patient-reported outcome measures: a comparison of worked examples.
    Petrillo J, Cano SJ, McLeod LD, Coon CD.
    Value Health; 2015 Jan; 18(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 25595231
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Psychometric aspects of item mapping for criterion-referenced interpretation and bookmark standard setting.
    Huynh H.
    J Appl Meas; 2010 Jan; 11(1):91-8. PubMed ID: 20351450
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The relationship between classical item characteristics and item response time on computer-based testing.
    Chae YM, Park SG, Park I.
    Korean J Med Educ; 2019 Mar; 31(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 30852856
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. General overview of the theories used in assessment: AMEE Guide No. 57.
    Schuwirth LW, van der Vleuten CP.
    Med Teach; 2011 Mar; 33(10):783-97. PubMed ID: 21942477
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Two item response theory models for analysing normative forced-choice personality items.
    Ferrando PJ.
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2006 Nov; 59(Pt 2):379-95. PubMed ID: 17067417
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 27.