These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
143 related items for PubMed ID: 20079758
21. Cross-trial priming of element positions in visual pop-out search is dependent on stimulus arrangement. Geyer T, Müller HJ, Krummenacher J. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Aug; 33(4):788-97. PubMed ID: 17683228 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Fortune and reversals of fortune in visual search: Reward contingencies for pop-out targets affect search efficiency and target repetition effects. Kristjánsson A, Sigurjónsdóttir O, Driver J. Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Jul; 72(5):1229-36. PubMed ID: 20601703 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The role of within-dimension singleton priming in visual search. Lamy D, Bar-Anan Y, Egeth HE. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Apr; 34(2):268-85. PubMed ID: 18377170 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. System identification in Priming of Pop-Out. Martini P. Vision Res; 2010 Oct 12; 50(21):2110-5. PubMed ID: 20691203 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Intertrial target-feature changes do not lead to more distraction by singletons: target uncertainty does. Lamy D, Yashar A. Vision Res; 2008 May 12; 48(10):1274-9. PubMed ID: 18395767 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Selective attention to specific features within objects: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Nobre AC, Rao A, Chelazzi L. J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Apr 12; 18(4):539-61. PubMed ID: 16768359 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Difficulty of discrimination modulates attentional capture by regulating attentional focus. Sawaki R, Katayama J. J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Feb 12; 21(2):359-71. PubMed ID: 18510441 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Contextual distinctiveness produces long-lasting priming of pop-out. Thomson DR, Milliken B. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Feb 12; 39(1):202-15. PubMed ID: 22506787 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Irrelevant singletons in pop-out search: attentional capture or filtering costs? Becker SI. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Aug 12; 33(4):764-87. PubMed ID: 17683227 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Priming of Pop-out provides reliable measures of target activation and distractor inhibition in selective attention. Lamy D, Antebi C, Aviani N, Carmel T. Vision Res; 2008 Jan 12; 48(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 18054983 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. At first sight: a high-level pop out effect for faces. Hershler O, Hochstein S. Vision Res; 2005 Jun 12; 45(13):1707-24. PubMed ID: 15792845 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Repetition of distractor sets improves visual search performance in hemispatial neglect. Saevarsson S, Jóelsdóttir S, Hjaltason H, Kristjánsson A. Neuropsychologia; 2008 Mar 07; 46(4):1161-9. PubMed ID: 18068736 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Irrelevant singletons in visual search do not capture attention but can produce nonspatial filtering costs. Wykowska A, Schubö A. J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Mar 07; 23(3):645-60. PubMed ID: 19929330 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Attentional capture in singleton-detection and feature-search modes. Lamy D, Egeth HE. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct 07; 29(5):1003-20. PubMed ID: 14585019 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. On the control of single-prime negative priming: the effects of practice and time course. Chao HF. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep 07; 35(5):1286-95. PubMed ID: 19686021 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Visual search for singleton feature targets across dimensions: Stimulus- and expectancy-driven effects in dimensional weighting. Muller HJ, Reimann B, Krummenacher J. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct 07; 29(5):1021-35. PubMed ID: 14585020 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The eyes have it: visual pop-out in infants and adults. Adler SA, Orprecio J. Dev Sci; 2006 Mar 07; 9(2):189-206. PubMed ID: 16472320 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Electrophysiological evidence of feature-based inhibition of focused attention across consecutive trials. Shin E, Wan XI, Fabiani M, Gratton G, Lleras A. Psychophysiology; 2008 Sep 07; 45(5):804-11. PubMed ID: 18665869 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Higher set sizes in pop-out search displays do not eliminate priming or enhance target selection. Becker SI, Ansorge U. Vision Res; 2013 Apr 05; 81():18-28. PubMed ID: 23478194 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Serial attention mechanisms in visual search: a direct behavioral demonstration. Bricolo E, Gianesini T, Fanini A, Bundesen C, Chelazzi L. J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Oct 01; 14(7):980-93. PubMed ID: 12419123 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]