These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
447 related items for PubMed ID: 20080243
1. The Acoustic Voice Quality Index: toward improved treatment outcomes assessment in voice disorders. Maryn Y, De Bodt M, Roy N. J Commun Disord; 2010; 43(3):161-74. PubMed ID: 20080243 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Objective assessment of pediatric voice disorders with the acoustic voice quality index. Reynolds V, Buckland A, Bailey J, Lipscombe J, Nathan E, Vijayasekaran S, Kelly R, Maryn Y, French N. J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):672.e1-7. PubMed ID: 22632794 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Toward improved ecological validity in the acoustic measurement of overall voice quality: combining continuous speech and sustained vowels. Maryn Y, Corthals P, Van Cauwenberge P, Roy N, De Bodt M. J Voice; 2010 Sep; 24(5):540-55. PubMed ID: 19883993 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Lithuanian Language. Uloza V, Petrauskas T, Padervinskis E, Ulozaitė N, Barsties B, Maryn Y. J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):257.e1-257.e11. PubMed ID: 27427182 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. External Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 03.01 With Extended Representativity. Barsties B, Maryn Y. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2016 Jul; 125(7):571-83. PubMed ID: 26951063 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index, Version 03.01, in French. Pommée T, Maryn Y, Finck C, Morsomme D. J Voice; 2020 Jul; 34(4):646.e11-646.e26. PubMed ID: 30598420 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Two Multiparameter Acoustic Indices of Dysphonia Severity: The Acoustic Voice Quality Index and Cepstral Spectral Index of Dysphonia. Lee JM, Roy N, Peterson E, Merrill RM. J Voice; 2018 Jul; 32(4):515.e1-515.e13. PubMed ID: 28739333 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Auditory-Perceptual and Acoustic Methods in Measuring Dysphonia Severity of Korean Speech. Maryn Y, Kim HT, Kim J. J Voice; 2016 Sep; 30(5):587-94. PubMed ID: 26316139 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of Dysphonia Severity Index and Acoustic Voice Quality Index measures in differentiating normal and dysphonic voices. Uloza V, Latoszek BBV, Ulozaite-Staniene N, Petrauskas T, Maryn Y. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Apr; 275(4):949-958. PubMed ID: 29442165 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Japanese Language. Hosokawa K, Barsties B, Iwahashi T, Iwahashi M, Kato C, Iwaki S, Sasai H, Miyauchi A, Matsushiro N, Inohara H, Ogawa M, Maryn Y. J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):260.e1-260.e9. PubMed ID: 27287930 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Toward validation of the cepstral spectral index of dysphonia (CSID) as an objective treatment outcomes measure. Peterson EA, Roy N, Awan SN, Merrill RM, Banks R, Tanner K. J Voice; 2013 Jul; 27(4):401-10. PubMed ID: 23809565 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The Minimal Important Difference of Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Treatment of Voice Disorders. Hosokawa K, Iwahashi T, Iwahashi M, Iwaki S, Yoshida M, Kitayama I, Miyauchi A, Ogawa M, Inohara H. Laryngoscope; 2024 Jun; 134(6):2805-2811. PubMed ID: 38112338 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 3.01 and Acoustic Breathiness Index in Korean Population. Kim GH, von Latoszek BB, Lee YW. J Voice; 2021 Jul; 35(4):660.e9-660.e18. PubMed ID: 31708369 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Korean Language. Kim GH, Lee YW, Bae IH, Park HJ, Wang SG, Kwon SB. J Voice; 2019 Nov; 33(6):948.e1-948.e9. PubMed ID: 30076095 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The value of the acoustic voice quality index as a measure of dysphonia severity in subjects speaking different languages. Maryn Y, De Bodt M, Barsties B, Roy N. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Jun; 271(6):1609-19. PubMed ID: 24162765 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Toward the development of an objective index of dysphonia severity: a four-factor acoustic model. Awan SN, Roy N. Clin Linguist Phon; 2006 Jun; 20(1):35-49. PubMed ID: 16393797 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Two Versions of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index for Quantification of Dysphonia Severity. Kim GH, Lee YW, Bae IH, Park HJ, Lee BJ, Kwon SB. J Voice; 2020 May; 34(3):489.e11-489.e19. PubMed ID: 30527706 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Consistency of voice frequency and perturbation measures in children using cepstral analyses: a movement toward increased recording stability. Diercks GR, Ojha S, Infusino S, Maurer R, Hartnick CJ. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Aug 01; 139(8):811-6. PubMed ID: 23949356 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Application of the acoustic voice quality index for objective measurement of dysphonia severity. Núñez-Batalla F, Díaz-Fresno E, Álvarez-Fernández A, Muñoz Cordero G, Llorente Pendás JL. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp (Engl Ed); 2017 Aug 01; 68(4):204-211. PubMed ID: 28213999 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]