These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


653 related items for PubMed ID: 20081538

  • 1. Contribution of consonant landmarks to speech recognition in simulated acoustic-electric hearing.
    Chen F, Loizou PC.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Apr; 31(2):259-67. PubMed ID: 20081538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The contribution of obstruent consonants and acoustic landmarks to speech recognition in noise.
    Li N, Loizou PC.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):3947. PubMed ID: 19206819
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Masking release and the contribution of obstruent consonants on speech recognition in noise by cochlear implant users.
    Li N, Loizou PC.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1262-71. PubMed ID: 20815461
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Factors affecting masking release in cochlear-implant vocoded speech.
    Li N, Loizou PC.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jul; 126(1):338-46. PubMed ID: 19603890
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The effects of selective consonant amplification on sentence recognition in noise by hearing-impaired listeners.
    Saripella R, Loizou PC, Thibodeau L, Alford JA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):3028-37. PubMed ID: 22087930
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Predicting the intelligibility of vocoded speech.
    Chen F, Loizou PC.
    Ear Hear; 2011 Nov; 32(3):331-8. PubMed ID: 21206363
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Phoneme recognition in vocoded maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
    Phatak SA, Grant KW.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):859-66. PubMed ID: 25096119
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D, Ahlstrom JB, Bologna WJ, Dubno JR.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Effects of introducing low-frequency harmonics in the perception of vocoded telephone speech.
    Hu Y, Loizou PC.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1280-9. PubMed ID: 20815463
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Electric and acoustic harmonic integration predicts speech-in-noise performance in hybrid cochlear implant users.
    Bonnard D, Schwalje A, Gantz B, Choi I.
    Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():223-230. PubMed ID: 29980380
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The relative importance of consonant and vowel segments to the recognition of words and sentences: effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D, Kewley-Port D, Humes LE.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1667-78. PubMed ID: 22978895
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Speech perception in simulated electric hearing exploits information-bearing acoustic change.
    Stilp CE, Goupell MJ, Kluender KR.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Feb; 133(2):EL136-41. PubMed ID: 23363194
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Effects of Additional Low-Pass-Filtered Speech on Listening Effort for Noise-Band-Vocoded Speech in Quiet and in Noise.
    Pals C, Sarampalis A, van Dijk M, Başkent D.
    Ear Hear; 2019 Feb; 40(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 29757801
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Assessing the perceptual contributions of vowels and consonants to Mandarin sentence intelligibility.
    Chen F, Wong LL, Wong EY.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):EL178-84. PubMed ID: 23927222
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The impact of reverberant self-masking and overlap-masking effects on speech intelligibility by cochlear implant listeners (L).
    Kokkinakis K, Loizou PC.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1099-102. PubMed ID: 21895052
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Effects of age on melody and timbre perception in simulations of electro-acoustic and cochlear-implant hearing.
    Arehart KH, Croghan NB, Muralimanohar RK.
    Ear Hear; 2014 Sep; 35(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 24441739
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Listeners Experience Linguistic Masking Release in Noise-Vocoded Speech-in-Speech Recognition.
    Viswanathan N, Kokkinakis K, Williams BT.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Feb 15; 61(2):428-435. PubMed ID: 29396580
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Information-bearing acoustic change outperforms duration in predicting intelligibility of full-spectrum and noise-vocoded sentences.
    Stilp CE.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar 15; 135(3):1518-29. PubMed ID: 24606287
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A glimpsing account for the benefit of simulated combined acoustic and electric hearing.
    Li N, Loizou PC.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Apr 15; 123(4):2287-94. PubMed ID: 18397033
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Importance of envelope modulations during consonants and vowels in segmentally interrupted sentences.
    Fogerty D.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar 15; 135(3):1568-76. PubMed ID: 24606291
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 33.