These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


331 related items for PubMed ID: 20083399

  • 1. Retail price as an outcome measure for the effectiveness of drug law enforcement.
    Bright DA, Ritter A.
    Int J Drug Policy; 2010 Sep; 21(5):359-63. PubMed ID: 20083399
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The cocaine and heroin markets in the era of globalisation and drug reduction policies.
    Costa Storti C, De Grauwe P.
    Int J Drug Policy; 2009 Nov; 20(6):488-96. PubMed ID: 19447024
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effect of drug law enforcement on drug market violence: a systematic review.
    Werb D, Rowell G, Guyatt G, Kerr T, Montaner J, Wood E.
    Int J Drug Policy; 2011 Mar; 22(2):87-94. PubMed ID: 21392957
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The effect of methamphetamine and heroin price on polydrug use: A behavioural economics analysis in Sydney, Australia.
    Chalmers J, Bradford D, Jones C.
    Int J Drug Policy; 2010 Sep; 21(5):381-9. PubMed ID: 20619627
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Estimating the economic value of British Columbia's domestic cannabis market: implications for provincial cannabis policy.
    Werb D, Nosyk B, Kerr T, Fischer B, Montaner J, Wood E.
    Int J Drug Policy; 2012 Nov; 23(6):436-41. PubMed ID: 23085258
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The socioeconomic impact of drug-related crimes in Chile.
    Fernández M.
    Int J Drug Policy; 2012 Nov; 23(6):465-72. PubMed ID: 22608568
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Globalization and the price decline of illicit drugs.
    Costa Storti C, De Grauwe P.
    Int J Drug Policy; 2009 Jan; 20(1):48-61. PubMed ID: 18272358
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Low-threshold methadone treatment, heroin price, police activity and incidence of heroin use: the Zurich experience.
    Nordt C, Stohler R.
    Int J Drug Policy; 2009 Nov; 20(6):497-501. PubMed ID: 19349154
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Illicit drugs policy through the lens of regulation.
    Ritter A.
    Int J Drug Policy; 2010 Jul; 21(4):265-70. PubMed ID: 20005691
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. An economic analysis of different cannabis decriminalization scenarios.
    Ogrodnik M, Kopp P, Bongaerts X, Tecco JM.
    Psychiatr Danub; 2015 Sep; 27 Suppl 1():S309-14. PubMed ID: 26417786
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Evaluating explanations of the Australian 'heroin shortage'.
    Degenhardt L, Reuter P, Collins L, Hall W.
    Addiction; 2005 Apr; 100(4):459-69. PubMed ID: 15784060
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The impact of law enforcement activity on a heroin market.
    Weatherburn D, Lind B.
    Addiction; 1997 May; 92(5):557-69; discussion 611-3. PubMed ID: 9219378
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Drug profiling: a new scientific contribution to law enforcement operations in Viet Nam.
    Hung HM, Tien ND, Truong NX.
    Bull Narc; 2005 May; 57(1-2):149-65. PubMed ID: 21338019
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Combined effects of law enforcement and substitution treatment on heroin mortality.
    Nordt C, Stohler R.
    Drug Alcohol Rev; 2010 Sep; 29(5):540-5. PubMed ID: 20887578
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Calibrating law enforcement and its purpose.
    Felbab-Brown V.
    Addiction; 2014 Dec; 109(12):1969-70. PubMed ID: 25384931
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Establishment of an operational system for drug profiling: a Swiss experience.
    Ioset S, Esseiva P, Ribaux O, Weyermann C, Anglada F, Lociciro S, Hayoz P, Baer I, Gasté L, Terrettaz-Zufferey AL, Delaporte C, Margot P.
    Bull Narc; 2005 Dec; 57(1-2):121-47. PubMed ID: 21338018
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Drug supply and drug abuse.
    Copeman M.
    CMAJ; 2003 Apr 29; 168(9):1113; author reply 1113. PubMed ID: 12719309
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Drug affordability-potential tool for comparing illicit drug markets.
    Groshkova T, Cunningham A, Royuela L, Singleton N, Saggers T, Sedefov R.
    Int J Drug Policy; 2018 Jun 29; 56():187-196. PubMed ID: 29459212
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Cannabis policies and user practices: market separation, price, potency, and accessibility in Amsterdam and San Francisco.
    Reinarman C.
    Int J Drug Policy; 2009 Jan 29; 20(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 18367390
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Demand for illicit drugs among pregnant women.
    Corman H, Noonan K, Reichman NE, Dave D.
    Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res; 2005 Jan 29; 16():41-60. PubMed ID: 17867234
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.