These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. A new dual-chamber pacing mode to minimize ventricular pacing. Savouré A, Fröhlig G, Galley D, Defaye P, Reuter S, Mabo P, Sadoul N, Amblard A, Limousin M, Anselme F. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2005 Jan; 28 Suppl 1():S43-6. PubMed ID: 15683522 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Reducing unnecessary right ventricular pacing with the managed ventricular pacing mode in patients with sinus node disease and AV block. Gillis AM, Pürerfellner H, Israel CW, Sunthorn H, Kacet S, Anelli-Monti M, Tang F, Young M, Boriani G, Medtronic Enrhythm Clinical Study Investigators. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2006 Jul; 29(7):697-705. PubMed ID: 16884504 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. DDD(R)-pacing, but not AAI(R)-pacing induces left ventricular desynchronization in patients with sick sinus syndrome: tissue-Doppler and 3D echocardiographic evaluation in a randomized controlled comparison. Albertsen AE, Nielsen JC, Poulsen SH, Mortensen PT, Pedersen AK, Hansen PS, Jensen HK, Egeblad H. Europace; 2008 Feb; 10(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 18192700 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Neuroendocrine and haemodynamic changes in single-lead atrial pacing and dual-chamber pacing modes. Zhang YY, Wu DY, Fu NK, Lu FM, Xu J. J Int Med Res; 2013 Aug; 41(4):1057-66. PubMed ID: 23816931 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Right versus left atrial pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (Riverleft study): study protocol for randomized controlled trial. Ramdjan TT, van der Does LJ, Knops P, Res JC, de Groot NM. Trials; 2014 Nov 17; 15():445. PubMed ID: 25403703 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Dual chamber pacing: how many patients remain in DDD mode over the long term? Ibrahim B, Sanderson JE, Wright B, Palmer R. Br Heart J; 1995 Jul 17; 74(1):76-9. PubMed ID: 7662461 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of automatic mode change between DDD and AAI to facilitate native atrioventricular conduction in patients with sick sinus syndrome or transient atrioventricular block. Mayumi H, Kohno H, Yasui H, Kawachi Y, Tokunaga K. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Nov 17; 19(11 Pt 2):1740-7. PubMed ID: 8945033 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Determination of the optimal atrioventricular interval in sick sinus syndrome during DDD pacing. Kato M, Dote K, Sasaki S, Goto K, Takemoto H, Habara S, Hasegawa D, Matsuda O. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2005 Sep 17; 28(9):892-7. PubMed ID: 16176525 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Support of spontaneous atrioventricular conduction in patients with DDR(R) pacemakers: effectiveness and safety]. Himmrich E, Krämer LI, Fischer W, Dörr T, Reinecke H, Multi-Mode-Switch-Studiengruppe. Herz; 2001 Feb 17; 26(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 11258112 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Effectiveness of atrial versus atrioventricular pacing for sick sinus syndrome during long-term follow-up. Kuniewicz M, Rydlewska A, Karkowski G, Lelakowska-Pieła M, Majewski J, Lelakowski J. Kardiol Pol; 2015 Feb 17; 73(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 25001847 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. DDD versus VVIR versus VVI mode in patients with indication to dual-chamber stimulation: a prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind study. Moro E, Caprioglio F, Berton G, Marcon C, Riva U, Corbucci G, Delise P. Ital Heart J; 2005 Sep 17; 6(9):728-33. PubMed ID: 16212074 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]