These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
25. Safety and efficiency of ventricular pacing prevention with an AAI-DDD changeover mode in patients with sinus node disease or atrioventricular block: impact on battery longevity-a sub-study of the ANSWER trial. Stockburger M, Defaye P, Boveda S, Stancak B, Lazarus A, Sipötz J, Nardi S, Rolando M, Moreno J. Europace; 2016 May; 18(5):739-46. PubMed ID: 26612882 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Long-term clinical effects of ventricular pacing reduction with a changeover mode to minimize ventricular pacing in a general pacemaker population. Stockburger M, Boveda S, Moreno J, Da Costa A, Hatala R, Brachmann J, Butter C, Garcia Seara J, Rolando M, Defaye P. Eur Heart J; 2015 Jan 14; 36(3):151-7. PubMed ID: 25179761 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Deleterious effects of long-term single-chamber ventricular pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome: the hidden benefits of dual-chamber pacing. Hesselson AB, Parsonnet V, Bernstein AD, Bonavita GJ. J Am Coll Cardiol; 1992 Jun 14; 19(7):1542-9. PubMed ID: 1593051 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluation of the early hemodynamic changes in carotid arteries during ventricular and dual chamber pacing. Soylu M, Ozdemir O, Geyik B, Ozbakir C, Demir AD, Duru E, Ozbal S, Hekimoglu B, Ozer T, Arda K. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2004 Nov 14; 27(11):1540-4. PubMed ID: 15546310 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Dynamic and dual-site atrial pacing in the prevention of atrial fibrillation: The STimolazione Atrial DInamica Multisito (STADIM) Study. De Simone A, Senatore G, Donnici G, Turco P, Romano E, Gazzola C, Stabile G. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 Jan 14; 30 Suppl 1():S71-4. PubMed ID: 17302722 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparative evaluation of left ventricular function in sick sinus syndrome on different long-term pacing modes. Mohan JC, Sethi KK, Arora R, Khalilullah M. Indian Heart J; 1994 Jan 14; 46(6):303-6. PubMed ID: 7797215 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Antiarrhythmic benefits of dual chamber stimulation with rate-response in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and chronotropic incompetence: a prospective, multicentre study. Bellocci F, Spampinato A, Ricci R, Puglisi A, Capucci A, Dini P, Boriani G, Botto G, Curnis A, Moracchini PV, Nicotra G, Lisi F, Nigro P. Europace; 1999 Oct 14; 1(4):220-5. PubMed ID: 11220558 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Managed ventricular pacing compared with conventional dual-chamber pacing for elective replacement in chronically paced patients: results of the Prefer for Elective Replacement Managed Ventricular Pacing randomized study. Botto GL, Ricci RP, Bénézet JM, Nielsen JC, De Roy L, Piot O, Quesada A, Quaglione R, Vaccari D, Garutti C, Vainer L, Kozák M, PreFER MVP Investigators. Heart Rhythm; 2014 Jun 14; 11(6):992-1000. PubMed ID: 24418164 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. [Evaluation on left ventricular systolic synchronicity and cardiac function in patients with permanent cardiac pacing by real-time three-dimensional echocardiography]. Cai JF, Wang RX, Li XR, Dai M, Zhang CY, Liu XY, Qian DJ. Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 2010 Mar 14; 38(3):215-9. PubMed ID: 20450562 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]