These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

521 related items for PubMed ID: 20093009

  • 1. Enhanced performance of air-cathode two-chamber microbial fuel cells with high-pH anode and low-pH cathode.
    Zhuang L, Zhou S, Li Y, Yuan Y.
    Bioresour Technol; 2010 May; 101(10):3514-9. PubMed ID: 20093009
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Effect of electrolyte pH on the rate of the anodic and cathodic reactions in an air-cathode microbial fuel cell.
    He Z, Huang Y, Manohar AK, Mansfeld F.
    Bioelectrochemistry; 2008 Nov; 74(1):78-82. PubMed ID: 18774345
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Improving performance of MFC by design alteration and adding cathodic electrolytes.
    Jadhav GS, Ghangrekar MM.
    Appl Biochem Biotechnol; 2008 Dec; 151(2-3):319-32. PubMed ID: 18438635
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Effects of the Pt loading side and cathode-biofilm on the performance of a membrane-less and single-chamber microbial fuel cell.
    Yang S, Jia B, Liu H.
    Bioresour Technol; 2009 Feb; 100(3):1197-202. PubMed ID: 18790635
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Impact of initial biofilm growth on the anode impedance of microbial fuel cells.
    Ramasamy RP, Ren Z, Mench MM, Regan JM.
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2008 Sep 01; 101(1):101-8. PubMed ID: 18646217
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Carbon dioxide addition to microbial fuel cell cathodes maintains sustainable catholyte pH and improves anolyte pH, alkalinity, and conductivity.
    Fornero JJ, Rosenbaum M, Cotta MA, Angenent LT.
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Apr 01; 44(7):2728-34. PubMed ID: 20178380
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A comparison of air and hydrogen peroxide oxygenated microbial fuel cell reactors.
    Tartakovsky B, Guiot SR.
    Biotechnol Prog; 2006 Apr 01; 22(1):241-6. PubMed ID: 16454516
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Performance evaluation of low cost microbial fuel cell fabricated using earthen pot with biotic and abiotic cathode.
    Behera M, Jana PS, Ghangrekar MM.
    Bioresour Technol; 2010 Feb 01; 101(4):1183-9. PubMed ID: 19800223
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Continuous power generation and microbial community structure of the anode biofilms in a three-stage microbial fuel cell system.
    Chung K, Okabe S.
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2009 Jul 01; 83(5):965-77. PubMed ID: 19404637
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Effect of pH on nutrient dynamics and electricity production using microbial fuel cells.
    Puig S, Serra M, Coma M, Cabré M, Balaguer MD, Colprim J.
    Bioresour Technol; 2010 Dec 01; 101(24):9594-9. PubMed ID: 20702091
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Solar energy powered microbial fuel cell with a reversible bioelectrode.
    Strik DP, Hamelers HV, Buisman CJ.
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Jan 01; 44(1):532-7. PubMed ID: 19961218
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 27.