These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

231 related items for PubMed ID: 2009848

  • 1. Evaluating lifting tasks using subjective and biomechanical estimates of stress at the lower back.
    Waikar A, Lee K, Aghazadeh F, Parks C.
    Ergonomics; 1991 Jan; 34(1):33-47. PubMed ID: 2009848
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Maximum acceptable weight of lift for side and back lifting.
    Lee K, Waikar A, Aghazadeh F.
    J Hum Ergol (Tokyo); 1990 Jun; 19(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 2092069
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Effects of asymmetric dynamic and isometric liftings on strength/force and rating of perceived exertion.
    Hattori Y, Ono Y, Shimaoka M, Hiruta S, Kamijima M, Shibata E, Ichihara G, Ando S, Villaneuva MB, Takeuchi Y.
    Ergonomics; 1996 Jun; 39(6):862-76. PubMed ID: 8681928
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Psychophysical lifting capacity over extended periods.
    Fernandez JE, Ayoub MM, Smith JL.
    Ergonomics; 1991 Jan; 34(1):23-32. PubMed ID: 2009847
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Spine loading as a function of lift frequency, exposure duration, and work experience.
    Marras WS, Parakkat J, Chany AM, Yang G, Burr D, Lavender SA.
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2006 May; 21(4):345-52. PubMed ID: 16310299
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Muscle fatigue and fatigue-related biomechanical changes during a cyclic lifting task.
    Bonato P, Ebenbichler GR, Roy SH, Lehr S, Posch M, Kollmitzer J, Della Croce U.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Aug 15; 28(16):1810-20. PubMed ID: 12923468
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Maximum acceptable repetitive lifting workload by Chinese subjects.
    Zhu ZX, Zhang ZJ.
    Ergonomics; 1990 Jul 15; 33(7):875-84. PubMed ID: 2226423
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The development of a model to predict the effects of worker and task factors on foot placements in manual material handling tasks.
    Wagner DW, Reed MP, Chaffin DB.
    Ergonomics; 2010 Nov 15; 53(11):1368-84. PubMed ID: 20967659
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A dynamic 3D biomechanical evaluation of the load on the low back during different patient-handling tasks.
    Skotte JH, Essendrop M, Hansen AF, Schibye B.
    J Biomech; 2002 Oct 15; 35(10):1357-66. PubMed ID: 12231281
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Biomechanical exploration on dynamic modes of lifting.
    Gagnon M, Smyth G.
    Ergonomics; 1992 Mar 15; 35(3):329-45. PubMed ID: 1572341
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The psychophysical lifting capacities of Chinese subjects.
    Lee YH, Wu SP, Hsu SH.
    Ergonomics; 1995 Apr 15; 38(4):671-83. PubMed ID: 7729395
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Low-back loading in lifting two loads beside the body compared to lifting one load in front of the body.
    Faber GS, Kingma I, Bakker AJ, van Dieën JH.
    J Biomech; 2009 Jan 05; 42(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 19084840
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.