These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
237 related items for PubMed ID: 20118730
1. Computer-aided volumetric comparison of reconstructed orbits for blow-out fractures with nonpreformed versus 3-dimensionally preformed titanium mesh plates: a preliminary study. Scolozzi P, Momjian A, Heuberger J. J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010 Jan; 34(1):98-104. PubMed ID: 20118730 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy and predictability in use of AO three-dimensionally preformed titanium mesh plates for posttraumatic orbital reconstruction: a pilot study. Scolozzi P, Momjian A, Heuberger J, Andersen E, Broome M, Terzic A, Jaques B. J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 20(4):1108-13. PubMed ID: 19553851 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of internal orbital reconstructions for pure blowout fractures: cranial bone grafts versus titanium mesh. Ellis E, Tan Y. J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Apr; 61(4):442-53. PubMed ID: 12684961 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Customized orbital implant versus 3D preformed titanium mesh for orbital fracture repair: A retrospective comparative analysis of orbital reconstruction accuracy. Consorti G, Betti E, Catarzi L. J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2024 Apr; 52(4):532-537. PubMed ID: 38368208 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Various applications of titanium mesh screen implant to orbital wall fractures. Park HS, Kim YK, Yoon CH. J Craniofac Surg; 2001 Nov; 12(6):555-60. PubMed ID: 11711822 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Low-profile titanium mesh in the use of orbital reconstruction: A pilot study. Lieger O, Schaller B, Kellner F, Messmer-Schai B, Iizuka T. Laryngoscope; 2012 May; 122(5):982-91. PubMed ID: 22374814 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]