These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


245 related items for PubMed ID: 20121540

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A novel LabVIEW-based multi-channel non-invasive abdominal maternal-fetal electrocardiogram signal generator.
    Martinek R, Kelnar M, Koudelka P, Vanus J, Bilik P, Janku P, Nazeran H, Zidek J.
    Physiol Meas; 2016 Feb; 37(2):238-56. PubMed ID: 26799770
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Intrapartum heart rate ambiguity: a comparison of cardiotocogram and abdominal fetal electrocardiogram with maternal electrocardiogram.
    Reinhard J, Hayes-Gill BR, Schiermeier S, Hatzmann H, Heinrich TM, Louwen F.
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2013 Feb; 75(2):101-8. PubMed ID: 23328351
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Non-invasive fetal monitoring using electrocardiography and phonocardiography: A preliminary study.
    Gobillot S, Fontecave-Jallon J, Equy V, Rivet B, Gumery PY, Hoffmann P.
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2018 Nov; 47(9):455-459. PubMed ID: 30144558
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Dynamic segmentation and linear prediction for maternal ECG removal in antenatal abdominal recordings.
    Vullings R, Peters CH, Sluijter RJ, Mischi M, Oei SG, Bergmans JW.
    Physiol Meas; 2009 Mar; 30(3):291-307. PubMed ID: 19223679
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Measuring fetal heart rate and variability: Fetal cardiotocography versus electrocardiography.
    DiPietro JA, Watson H, Raghunathan RS.
    Dev Psychobiol; 2022 Jan; 64(1):e22230. PubMed ID: 35050511
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Fetal electrocardiography: feasibility of long-term fetal heart rate recordings.
    Graatsma EM, Jacod BC, van Egmond LA, Mulder EJ, Visser GH.
    BJOG; 2009 Jan; 116(2):334-7; discussion 337-8. PubMed ID: 19076966
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The Noninvasive Fetal Electrocardiogram During Labor: A Review of the Literature.
    Lempersz C, Noben L, de Vries B, van Laar JOEH, Westerhuis MEMH, Oei SG.
    Obstet Gynecol Surv; 2020 Jun; 75(6):369-380. PubMed ID: 32603475
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Hidden Markov model in nonnegative matrix factorization for fetal heart rate estimation using physiological priors.
    Reséndiz Rojas M, Fontecave-Jallon J, Rivet B.
    Physiol Meas; 2022 Oct 06; 43(10):. PubMed ID: 36113452
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Intrapartum ST segment analyses (STAN) using simultaneous invasive and non-invasive fetal electrocardiography: a report of 6 cases.
    Reinhard J, Hayes-Gill B, Yuan J, Schiermeier S, Louwen F.
    Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2014 Jun 06; 218(3):122-7. PubMed ID: 24999790
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Understanding fetal physiology and second line monitoring during labor.
    Garabedian C, De Jonckheere J, Butruille L, Deruelle P, Storme L, Houfflin-Debarge V.
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2017 Feb 06; 46(2):113-117. PubMed ID: 28403965
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.