These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

299 related items for PubMed ID: 20124902

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Clinical evaluation of higher stimulation rates in the nucleus research platform 8 system.
    Plant K, Holden L, Skinner M, Arcaroli J, Whitford L, Law MA, Nel E.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):381-93. PubMed ID: 17485987
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds of pediatric cochlear implant recipients and its clinical application].
    Xi X, Hong MD, Han DY, Huang DL, Yang WY.
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2003 Feb; 38(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 12778767
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Using evoked compound action potentials to assess activation of electrodes and predict C-levels in the Tempo+ cochlear implant speech processor.
    Alvarez I, de la Torre A, Sainz M, Roldán C, Schoesser H, Spitzer P.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):134-45. PubMed ID: 19838116
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 1. Growth of loudness and ECAP amplitude with current.
    Cohen LT.
    Hear Res; 2009 Jan; 247(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 19063956
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparing cochlear implant users' speech performance with processor fittings based on conventionally determined T and C levels or on compound action potential thresholds and live-voice speech in a prospective balanced crossover study.
    Willeboer C, Smoorenburg GF.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):789-98. PubMed ID: 17086087
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Electrical compound action potentials recorded with automated neural response telemetry: threshold changes as a function of time and electrode position.
    Spivak L, Auerbach C, Vambutas A, Geshkovich S, Wexler L, Popecki B.
    Ear Hear; 2011 Feb; 32(1):104-13. PubMed ID: 20686409
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Differences between electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) and behavioral measures in children with cochlear implants operated in the school age vs. operated in the first years of life.
    Vlahović S, Šindija B, Aras I, Glunčić M, Trotić R.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 May; 76(5):731-9. PubMed ID: 22398117
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.