These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

150 related items for PubMed ID: 20134081

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A scatter correction method for dual-energy digital mammography: Monte Carlo simulation.
    Ai K, Gao Y, Yu G.
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2014; 22(5):653-71. PubMed ID: 25265925
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Improved scatter correction using adaptive scatter kernel superposition.
    Sun M, Star-Lack JM.
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Nov 21; 55(22):6695-720. PubMed ID: 21030750
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A digital filtration technique for scatter-glare correction based on thickness estimation.
    Ersahin A, Molloi S, Qian YJ.
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1995 Nov 21; 14(3):587-95. PubMed ID: 18215863
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Resolution enhancement in digital x-ray imaging.
    Gravel P, Després P, Beaudoin G, de Guise JA.
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 May 21; 51(10):2415-39. PubMed ID: 16675861
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Characterization of scatter in digital mammography from use of Monte Carlo simulations and comparison to physical measurements.
    Leon SM, Brateman LF, Wagner LK.
    Med Phys; 2014 Nov 21; 41(11):111914. PubMed ID: 25370647
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Algorithmic scatter correction in dual-energy digital mammography.
    Chen X, Nishikawa RM, Chan ST, Lau BA, Zhang L, Mou X.
    Med Phys; 2013 Nov 21; 40(11):111919. PubMed ID: 24320452
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Contrast-to-noise ratios of different elements in digital mammography: evaluation of their potential as new contrast agents.
    Diekmann F, Sommer A, Lawaczeck R, Diekmann S, Pietsch H, Speck U, Hamm B, Bick U.
    Invest Radiol; 2007 May 21; 42(5):319-25. PubMed ID: 17414528
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Automated analysis of phantom images for the evaluation of long-term reproducibility in digital mammography.
    Gennaro G, Ferro F, Contento G, Fornasin F, di Maggio C.
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Mar 07; 52(5):1387-407. PubMed ID: 17301461
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Fully iterative scatter corrected digital breast tomosynthesis using GPU-based fast Monte Carlo simulation and composition ratio update.
    Kim K, Lee T, Seong Y, Lee J, Jang KE, Choi J, Choi YW, Kim HH, Shin HJ, Cha JH, Cho S, Ye JC.
    Med Phys; 2015 Sep 07; 42(9):5342-55. PubMed ID: 26328983
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Optimization of x-ray spectra in digital mammography through Monte Carlo simulations.
    Cunha DM, Tomal A, Poletti ME.
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Apr 07; 57(7):1919-35. PubMed ID: 22421418
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Scatter estimation for a digital radiographic system using convolution filtering.
    Love LA, Kruger RA.
    Med Phys; 1987 Apr 07; 14(2):178-85. PubMed ID: 3587135
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.