These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

248 related items for PubMed ID: 20134179

  • 1. Comparison of conventional versus colored compomers for class II restorations in primary molars: a 12-month clinical study.
    Ertugrul F, Cogulu D, Ozdemir Y, Ersin N.
    Med Princ Pract; 2010; 19(2):148-52. PubMed ID: 20134179
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Clinical evaluation of composite and compomer restorations in primary teeth: 24-month results.
    Pascon FM, Kantovitz KR, Caldo-Teixeira AS, Borges AF, Silva TN, Puppin-Rontani RM, Garcia-Godoy F.
    J Dent; 2006 Jul; 34(6):381-8. PubMed ID: 16242232
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Three-year follow up assessment of Class II restorations in primary molars with a polyacid-modified composite resin and a hybrid composite.
    Attin T, Opatowski A, Meyer C, Zingg-Meyer B, Buchalla W, Mönting JS.
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 11572292
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Class II restorations with a polyacid-modified composite resin in primary molars placed in a dental practice: results of a two-year clinical evaluation.
    Attin T, Opatowski A, Meyer C, Zingg-Meyer B, Mönting JS.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Jun; 25(4):259-64. PubMed ID: 11203828
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Clinical evaluation of a colored compomer in primary molars.
    Akbay Oba A, Sönmez IS, Sari S.
    Med Princ Pract; 2009 Jun; 18(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 19060488
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Tooth-colored filling materials for the restoration of cervical lesions: a 24-month follow-up study.
    Folwaczny M, Loher C, Mehl A, Kunzelmann KH, Hinkel R.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Jun; 25(4):251-8. PubMed ID: 11203827
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Randomised trial of resin-based restorations in Class I and Class II beveled preparations in primary molars: 48-month results.
    Alves dos Santos MP, Luiz RR, Maia LC.
    J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):451-9. PubMed ID: 20188783
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Clinical performance of pulpotomized primary molars restored with resin-based materials. 24-month results.
    Cehreli ZC, Cetinguc A, Cengiz SB, Altay AN.
    Am J Dent; 2006 Oct; 19(5):262-6. PubMed ID: 17073200
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Clinical evaluation of a compomer and an amalgam primary teeth class II restorations: a 2-year comparative study.
    Kavvadia K, Kakaboura A, Vanderas AP, Papagiannoulis L.
    Pediatr Dent; 2004 Oct; 26(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 15185806
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Survival of self-etch adhesive Class II composite restorations using ART and conventional cavity preparations in primary molars.
    Eden E, Topaloglu-Ak A, Frencken JE, van't Hof M.
    Am J Dent; 2006 Dec; 19(6):359-63. PubMed ID: 17212078
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and two polyacid-modified resin composites in cervical lesions restorations: 1-year follow-up.
    Chinelatti MA, Ramos RP, Chimello DT, Palma-Dibb RG.
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Mar; 31(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 15025658
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Clinical evaluation of polyacid-modified resin composite posterior restorations: one-year results.
    Luo Y, Lo EC, Fang DT, Wei SH.
    Quintessence Int; 2000 Oct; 31(9):630-6. PubMed ID: 11203987
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Clinical evaluation of Dyract AP restorative in permanent molars: 2-year results.
    Luo Y, Lo EC, Fang DT, Smales RJ, Wei SH.
    Am J Dent; 2002 Dec; 15(6):403-6. PubMed ID: 12691278
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Clinical evaluation of glass-ionomer tunnel restorations in primary molars: 36 months results.
    Markovic D, Peric T.
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Mar; 53(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 18304240
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. 4-year clinical performance and survival analysis of Class I and II compomer restorations in permanent teeth.
    Huth KC, Manhart J, Selbertinger A, Paschos E, Kaaden C, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R.
    Am J Dent; 2004 Feb; 17(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 15241910
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Nine-year evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite/resin composite open sandwich technique in Class II cavities.
    Lindberg A, van Dijken JW, Lindberg M.
    J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 16956709
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer) in Class II restorations of primary teeth: a two-year follow-up study.
    Papagiannoulis L, Kakaboura A, Pantaleon F, Kavvadia K.
    Pediatr Dent; 1999 Feb; 21(4):231-4. PubMed ID: 10436476
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. 3-year evaluation of a new open sandwich technique in Class II cavities.
    Lindberg A, van Dijken JW, Lindberg M.
    Am J Dent; 2003 Feb; 16(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 12744410
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Factors influencing dentists' choice of amalgam and tooth-colored restorative materials for Class II preparations in younger patients.
    Vidnes-Kopperud S, Tveit AB, Gaarden T, Sandvik L, Espelid I.
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2009 Feb; 67(2):74-9. PubMed ID: 19085213
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A clinical evaluation of a resin composite and a compomer in non-carious Class V lesions. A 3-year follow-up.
    Pollington S, van Noort R.
    Am J Dent; 2008 Feb; 21(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 18435377
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.