These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

181 related items for PubMed ID: 20138712

  • 1. Responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire in patients with hand injury.
    Horng YS, Lin MC, Feng CT, Huang CH, Wu HC, Wang JD.
    J Hand Surg Am; 2010 Mar; 35(3):430-6. PubMed ID: 20138712
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire in carpal tunnel surgery.
    Kotsis SV, Chung KC.
    J Hand Surg Am; 2005 Jan; 30(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 15680560
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Korean version of the Michigan hand questionnaire.
    Roh YH, Yang BK, Noh JH, Baek GH, Song CH, Gong HS.
    J Hand Surg Am; 2011 Sep; 36(9):1497-503. PubMed ID: 21783329
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Responsiveness of three Patient Report Outcome (PRO) measures in patients with hand fractures: A preliminary cohort study.
    Weinstock-Zlotnick G, Page C, Ghomrawi HM, Wolff AL.
    J Hand Ther; 2015 Sep; 28(4):403-10; quiz 411. PubMed ID: 26209162
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Effective hand function assessment after burn injuries.
    Umraw N, Chan Y, Gomez M, Cartotto RC, Fish JS.
    J Burn Care Rehabil; 2004 Sep; 25(1):134-9; discussion 128. PubMed ID: 14726754
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Which hand outcome measurement is best for Turkish speaking patients?
    Oksüz C, Akel BS, Leblebicioğlu G, Kayıhan H.
    Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2012 Sep; 46(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 22491431
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparative responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and the Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire after carpal tunnel release.
    Chatterjee JS, Price PE.
    J Hand Surg Am; 2009 Feb; 34(2):273-80. PubMed ID: 19181227
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire in rheumatoid arthritis patients: relationship with disease activity, quality of life, and handgrip strength.
    Durmus D, Uzuner B, Durmaz Y, Bilgici A, Kuru O.
    J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 2013 Feb; 26(4):467-73. PubMed ID: 23948837
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Is the disability of arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire (DASH) also valid and responsive in patients with neck complaints.
    Huisstede BM, Feleus A, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Verhaar JA, Koes BW.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Feb 15; 34(4):E130-8. PubMed ID: 19182703
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire: longitudinal construct validity and measuring self-rated health change after surgery.
    Gummesson C, Atroshi I, Ekdahl C.
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2003 Jun 16; 4():11. PubMed ID: 12809562
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparative responsiveness of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand, the carpal tunnel questionnaire, and the SF-36 to clinical change after carpal tunnel release.
    Gay RE, Amadio PC, Johnson JC.
    J Hand Surg Am; 2003 Mar 16; 28(2):250-4. PubMed ID: 12671856
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of responsiveness of Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire, and Duruöz Hand Index in patients with traumatic hand injury.
    Dogu B, Usen A, Kuran B, Yilmaz F, Sirzai H.
    J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 2019 Mar 16; 32(1):111-117. PubMed ID: 30248042
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparing the AUSCAN Osteoarthritis Hand Index, Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire, and Sequential Occupational Dexterity Assessment for patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
    Massy-Westropp N, Krishnan J, Ahern M.
    J Rheumatol; 2004 Oct 16; 31(10):1996-2001. PubMed ID: 15468366
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Combat casualty hand burns: evaluating impairment and disability during recovery.
    Chapman TT, Richard RL, Hedman TL, Renz EM, Wolf SE, Holcomb JB.
    J Hand Ther; 2008 Oct 16; 21(2):150-8; quiz 159. PubMed ID: 18436137
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Which questionnaire is best? The reliability, validity and ease of use of the Patient Evaluation Measure, the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand and the Michigan Hand Outcome Measure.
    Dias JJ, Rajan RA, Thompson JR.
    J Hand Surg Eur Vol; 2008 Feb 16; 33(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 18332014
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) questionnaire: Determining functional activity profiles in patients with upper extremity disorders.
    Jester A, Harth A, Wind G, Germann G, Sauerbier M.
    J Hand Surg Br; 2005 Feb 16; 30(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 15620487
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and physical measurements in outcome studies of distal radius fracture treatment.
    Kotsis SV, Lau FH, Chung KC.
    J Hand Surg Am; 2007 Jan 16; 32(1):84-90. PubMed ID: 17218180
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.