These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

195 related items for PubMed ID: 20143304

  • 1. Does the number of choice sets matter? Results from a web survey applying a discrete choice experiment.
    Bech M, Kjaer T, Lauridsen J.
    Health Econ; 2011 Mar; 20(3):273-86. PubMed ID: 20143304
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Patient preferences for depression treatment programs and willingness to pay for treatment.
    Morey E, Thacher JA, Craighead WE.
    J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2007 Jun; 10(2):73-85. PubMed ID: 17603148
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Patient preferences and willingness to wait for a work-related orthopaedic rehabilitation: a discrete choice experiment].
    Bethge M.
    Gesundheitswesen; 2009 Mar; 71(3):152-60. PubMed ID: 19288431
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Convergent validity between a discrete choice experiment and a direct, open-ended method: comparison of preferred attribute levels and willingness to pay estimates.
    Marjon van der Pol, Shiell A, Au F, Johnston D, Tough S.
    Soc Sci Med; 2008 Dec; 67(12):2043-50. PubMed ID: 18952337
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Socioeconomic differences in preferences and willingness-to-pay for insulin delivery systems in type 1 and type 2 diabetes.
    Guimarães C, Marra CA, Colley L, Gill S, Simpson S, Meneilly G, Queiroz RH, Lynd LD.
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2009 Sep; 11(9):567-73. PubMed ID: 19764835
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A closer look at decision and analyst error by including nonlinearities in discrete choice models: implications on willingness-to-pay estimates derived from discrete choice data in healthcare.
    de Bekker-Grob EW, Rose JM, Bliemer MC.
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2013 Dec; 31(12):1169-83. PubMed ID: 24178372
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Use of willingness to pay to study values for pharmacotherapies for migraine headache.
    Lenert LA.
    Med Care; 2003 Feb; 41(2):299-308. PubMed ID: 12555057
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Investigating the structural reliability of a discrete choice experiment within health technology assessment.
    Ratcliffe J, Longworth L.
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2002 Feb; 18(1):139-44. PubMed ID: 11987437
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Willingness to pay for a QALY.
    Gyrd-Hansen D.
    Health Econ; 2003 Dec; 12(12):1049-60. PubMed ID: 14673813
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.