These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

283 related items for PubMed ID: 20144839

  • 1. Peak flux performance and microbial removal by selected membrane bioreactor systems.
    Hirani ZM, DeCarolis JF, Adham SS, Jacangelo JG.
    Water Res; 2010 Apr; 44(8):2431-40. PubMed ID: 20144839
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Occurrence and removal of microbial indicators from municipal wastewaters by nine different MBR systems.
    Hirani ZM, Decarolis JF, Lehman G, Adham SS, Jacangelo JG.
    Water Sci Technol; 2012 Apr; 66(4):865-71. PubMed ID: 22766879
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Effect of membrane type and material on performance of a submerged membrane bioreactor.
    Choi JH, Ng HY.
    Chemosphere; 2008 Mar; 71(5):853-9. PubMed ID: 18164743
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. A pilot scale anoxic/oxic membrane bioreactor (A/O MBR) for woolen mill dyeing wastewater treatment.
    Zheng X, Fan YB, Wei YS.
    J Environ Sci (China); 2003 Jul; 15(4):449-55. PubMed ID: 12974303
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Membrane bioreactors for water reclamation.
    Tao G, Kekre K, Wei Z, Lee TC, Viswanath B, Seah H.
    Water Sci Technol; 2005 Jul; 51(6-7):431-40. PubMed ID: 16004005
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Biomass characteristics of two types of submerged membrane bioreactors for nitrogen removal from wastewater.
    Liang Z, Das A, Beerman D, Hu Z.
    Water Res; 2010 Jun; 44(11):3313-20. PubMed ID: 20371094
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Performances and fouling control of a flat sheet membrane in a MBR pilot-plant.
    Grélot A, Grelier P, Tazi-Pain A, Lesjean B, Brüss U, Grasmick A.
    Water Sci Technol; 2010 Jun; 61(9):2185-92. PubMed ID: 20418613
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The effect of organic loading on process performance and membrane fouling in a submerged membrane bioreactor treating municipal wastewater.
    Trussell RS, Merlo RP, Hermanowicz SW, Jenkins D.
    Water Res; 2006 Aug; 40(14):2675-83. PubMed ID: 16824577
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of two treatments for the removal of selected organic micropollutants and bulk organic matter: conventional activated sludge followed by ultrafiltration versus membrane bioreactor.
    Sahar E, Ernst M, Godehardt M, Hein A, Herr J, Kazner C, Melin T, Cikurel H, Aharoni A, Messalem R, Brenner A, Jekel M.
    Water Sci Technol; 2011 Aug; 63(4):733-40. PubMed ID: 21330721
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.