These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
25. Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source CT coronary angiography: The effect of average heart rate, heart rate variability, and calcium score in a clinical perspective. Zhang LJ, Wu SY, Wang J, Lu Y, Zhang ZL, Jiang SS, Zhou CS, Lu GM. Acta Radiol; 2010 Sep; 51(7):727-40. PubMed ID: 20707657 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography coronary angiography and evaluation of stress-only single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography hybrid imaging: comparison of prospective electrocardiogram-triggering vs. retrospective gating. Husmann L, Herzog BA, Gaemperli O, Tatsugami F, Burkhard N, Valenta I, Veit-Haibach P, Wyss CA, Landmesser U, Kaufmann PA. Eur Heart J; 2009 Mar; 30(5):600-7. PubMed ID: 19106197 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Magnetic resonance adenosine perfusion imaging in patients after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Klein C, Nagel E, Gebker R, Kelle S, Schnackenburg B, Graf K, Dreysse S, Fleck E. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2009 Apr; 2(4):437-45. PubMed ID: 19580726 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Adenosine stress high-pitch 128-slice dual-source myocardial computed tomography perfusion for imaging of reversible myocardial ischemia: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Feuchtner G, Goetti R, Plass A, Wieser M, Scheffel H, Wyss C, Stolzmann P, Donati O, Schnabl J, Falk V, Alkadhi H, Leschka S, Cury RC. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 Sep; 4(5):540-9. PubMed ID: 21862731 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Diagnostic performance of static single-scan stress perfusion cardiac computed tomography in detecting hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis: a comparison with combined invasive coronary angiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance-myocardial perfusion imaging. Song I, Yi JG, Park JH, Kim MY, Shin JK, Ko SM. Acta Radiol; 2018 Oct; 59(10):1184-1193. PubMed ID: 29320864 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Diagnostic performance of non-contrast-enhanced whole-heart magnetic resonance coronary angiography in combination with adenosine stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Heer T, Reiter S, Höfling B, Pilz G. Am Heart J; 2013 Dec; 166(6):999-1009. PubMed ID: 24268214 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Is contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging at 3 T superior to 1.5 T for detection of coronary artery disease? Walcher T, Ikuye K, Rottbauer W, Wöhrle J, Bernhardt P. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Feb; 29(2):355-61. PubMed ID: 22825256 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Usefulness of additional coronary calcium scoring in low-dose CT coronary angiography with prospective ECG-triggering impact on total effective radiation dose and diagnostic accuracy. Husmann L, Herzog BA, Burger IA, Buechel RR, Pazhenkottil AP, von Schulthess P, Wyss CA, Gaemperli O, Landmesser U, Kaufmann PA. Acad Radiol; 2010 Feb; 17(2):201-6. PubMed ID: 19944630 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Computed tomography myocardial perfusion vs 15O-water positron emission tomography and fractional flow reserve. Williams MC, Mirsadraee S, Dweck MR, Weir NW, Fletcher A, Lucatelli C, MacGillivray T, Golay SK, Cruden NL, Henriksen PA, Uren N, McKillop G, Lima JA, Reid JH, van Beek EJ, Patel D, Newby DE. Eur Radiol; 2017 Mar; 27(3):1114-1124. PubMed ID: 27334015 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Integrated single-photon emission computed tomography and computed tomography coronary angiography for the assessment of hemodynamically significant coronary artery lesions. Rispler S, Keidar Z, Ghersin E, Roguin A, Soil A, Dragu R, Litmanovich D, Frenkel A, Aronson D, Engel A, Beyar R, Israel O. J Am Coll Cardiol; 2007 Mar 13; 49(10):1059-67. PubMed ID: 17349885 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Combined coronary and late-enhanced multidetector-computed tomography for delineation of the etiology of left ventricular dysfunction: comparison with coronary angiography and contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. le Polain de Waroux JB, Pouleur AC, Goffinet C, Pasquet A, Vanoverschelde JL, Gerber BL. Eur Heart J; 2008 Oct 13; 29(20):2544-51. PubMed ID: 18762553 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Individual component analysis of the multi-parametric cardiovascular magnetic resonance protocol in the CE-MARC trial. Ripley DP, Motwani M, Brown JM, Nixon J, Everett CC, Bijsterveld P, Maredia N, Plein S, Greenwood JP. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2015 Jul 15; 17(1):59. PubMed ID: 26174854 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Accurate late gadolinium enhancement prediction by early T1- based quantitative synthetic mapping. van Dijk R, Kuijpers D, Kaandorp TAM, van Dijkman PRM, Vliegenthart R, van der Harst P, Oudkerk M. Eur Radiol; 2018 Feb 15; 28(2):844-850. PubMed ID: 28856412 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. [Value of combined CT coronary angiography and adenosine stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy for diagnosis of coronary artery disease]. Wang Q, Gai LY, Chen YD, Wang ZG, Feng B, Guan ZW, Xu BX, Dong W, Yang L. Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 2011 Mar 15; 39(3):233-7. PubMed ID: 21609528 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Accuracy of high-pitch prospectively ECG-triggering CT coronary angiography for assessment of stenosis in 103 patients: comparison with invasive coronary angiography. Hu XH, Zheng WL, Wang D, Xie SS, Wu R, Zhang SZ. Clin Radiol; 2012 Nov 15; 67(11):1083-8. PubMed ID: 22613169 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Combined CT angiography and SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging for the detection of functionally relevant coronary stenoses. Li JM, Shi RF, Zhang LR, Li T, Dong Z. Mol Med Rep; 2013 May 15; 7(5):1391-6. PubMed ID: 23467850 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]