These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
135 related items for PubMed ID: 20151878
1. The adaptive pattern of the late auditory evoked potential elicited by repeated stimuli in cochlear implant users. Zhang F, Anderson J, Samy R, Houston L. Int J Audiol; 2010 Apr; 49(4):277-85. PubMed ID: 20151878 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Recovery function of the late auditory evoked potential in cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners. Zhang F, Samy RN, Anderson JM, Houston L. J Am Acad Audiol; 2009 Apr; 20(7):397-408. PubMed ID: 19928394 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of evoked potentials to dyadic tones after cochlear implantation. Sandmann P, Eichele T, Buechler M, Debener S, Jäncke L, Dillier N, Hugdahl K, Meyer M. Brain; 2009 Jul; 132(Pt 7):1967-79. PubMed ID: 19293240 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Relationship between auditory perception skills and mismatch negativity recorded in free field in cochlear-implant users. Roman S, Canévet G, Marquis P, Triglia JM, Liégeois-Chauvel C. Hear Res; 2005 Mar; 201(1-2):10-20. PubMed ID: 15721556 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Electrophysiological and speech perception measures of auditory processing in experienced adult cochlear implant users. Kelly AS, Purdy SC, Thorne PR. Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 116(6):1235-46. PubMed ID: 15978485 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessing binaural/bimodal advantages using auditory event-related potentials in subjects with cochlear implants. Sasaki T, Yamamoto K, Iwaki T, Kubo T. Auris Nasus Larynx; 2009 Oct; 36(5):541-6. PubMed ID: 19297109 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Dynamics of auditory plasticity after cochlear implantation: a longitudinal study. Pantev C, Dinnesen A, Ross B, Wollbrink A, Knief A. Cereb Cortex; 2006 Jan; 16(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 15843632 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of cochlear implantation on music perception by adults with usable pre-operative acoustic hearing. Looi V, McDermott H, McKay C, Hickson L. Int J Audiol; 2008 May; 47(5):257-68. PubMed ID: 18465410 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials Recorded From Nucleus Hybrid Cochlear Implant Users. Brown CJ, Jeon EK, Chiou LK, Kirby B, Karsten SA, Turner CW, Abbas PJ. Ear Hear; 2015 May; 36(6):723-32. PubMed ID: 26295607 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Speech-evoked cognitive P300 potentials in cochlear implant recipients. Micco AG, Kraus N, Koch DB, McGee TJ, Carrell TD, Sharma A, Nicol T, Wiet RJ. Am J Otol; 1995 Jul; 16(4):514-20. PubMed ID: 8588653 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Neural adaptation and behavioral measures of temporal processing and speech perception in cochlear implant recipients. Zhang F, Benson C, Murphy D, Boian M, Scott M, Keith R, Xiang J, Abbas P. PLoS One; 2013 Jul; 8(12):e84631. PubMed ID: 24386403 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Auditory late cortical response and speech recognition in Digisonic cochlear implant users. Maurer J, Collet L, Pelster H, Truy E, Gallégo S. Laryngoscope; 2002 Dec; 112(12):2220-4. PubMed ID: 12461344 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Automatic and attentive processing of sounds in cochlear implant patients - electrophysiological evidence. Nager W, Münte TF, Bohrer I, Lenarz T, Dengler R, Möbes J, Schröder C, Lesinski-Schiedat A. Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2007 Dec; 25(3-4):391-6. PubMed ID: 17943014 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]