These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

157 related items for PubMed ID: 20162122

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Clinical and histologic comparison of two different composite grafts for sinus augmentation: a pilot clinical trial.
    Galindo-Moreno P, Avila G, Fernández-Barbero JE, Mesa F, O'Valle-Ravassa F, Wang HL.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Aug; 19(8):755-9. PubMed ID: 18573123
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. New harvesting technique for bone grafting. Case reports.
    Partridge CG, Hostalet G.
    J Indiana Dent Assoc; 2003 Aug; 82(2):19-22. PubMed ID: 14533258
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Sinus bone augmentation: a review of the common techniques.
    Farhat FF, Kinaia B, Gross HB.
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2008 Sep; 29(7):388-92, 394-7; quiz 398. PubMed ID: 18795633
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Surgical solutions to prosthetic problems.
    Smiler DG.
    J Dent Symp; 1993 Aug; 1():44-9. PubMed ID: 8186837
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [The proximal tibia. A possible donor site in preprosthetic surgery].
    Bogdán S, Németh Z, Huszár T, Ujpál M, Barabás J, Divinyi T.
    Fogorv Sz; 2008 Apr; 101(2):58-63. PubMed ID: 18664096
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Surgical reconstruction of the atrophic maxilla.
    Bavar T, Federici VB.
    Compendium; 1993 Oct; 14(10):1318-27; quiz 1328. PubMed ID: 8118835
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. A combination of three minimally invasive surgical procedures for implant placement in the posterior maxilla with insufficient bone quantity.
    Yura S, Kato T, Ooi K, Izumiyama Y.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Aug; 106(2):e1-5. PubMed ID: 18554959
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The use of bone grafting materials in implant surgical applications: Part 1.
    Simons AM.
    J Macomb Dent Soc; 1992 Aug; 31(1):13-4. PubMed ID: 1303402
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Onlay augmentation versus sinuslift procedure in the treatment of the severely resorbed maxilla: a 5-year comparative longitudinal study.
    Wiltfang J, Schultze-Mosgau S, Nkenke E, Thorwarth M, Neukam FW, Schlegel KA.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Dec; 34(8):885-9. PubMed ID: 15978775
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Outcome of oral implants after autogenous bone reconstruction].
    Kamal D, Abida S, Jammet P, Goudot P, Yachouh J.
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2009 Apr; 110(2):86-8. PubMed ID: 19327803
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Calvarial versus iliac crest for autologous bone graft material for a sinus lift procedure: a histomorphometric study.
    Crespi R, Vinci R, Capparè P, Gherlone E, Romanos GE.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007 Apr; 22(4):527-32. PubMed ID: 17929512
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.