These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
257 related items for PubMed ID: 20163675
1. Detection and identification of rumen bacteria constituting a fibrolytic consortium dominated by Fibrobacter succinogenes. Shinkai T, Ueki T, Kobayashi Y. Anim Sci J; 2010 Feb; 81(1):72-9. PubMed ID: 20163675 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Determination of bacteria constituting ruminal fibrolytic consortia developed on orchard grass hay stem. Shinkai T, Ueki T, Koike S, Kobayashi Y. Anim Sci J; 2014 Mar; 85(3):254-61. PubMed ID: 24261635 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Localization of ruminal cellulolytic bacteria on plant fibrous materials as determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization and real-time PCR. Shinkai T, Kobayashi Y. Appl Environ Microbiol; 2007 Mar; 73(5):1646-52. PubMed ID: 17209077 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantification by real-time PCR of cellulolytic bacteria in the rumen of sheep after supplementation of a forage diet with readily fermentable carbohydrates: effect of a yeast additive. Mosoni P, Chaucheyras-Durand F, Béra-Maillet C, Forano E. J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Dec; 103(6):2676-85. PubMed ID: 18045448 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of disodium fumarate on ruminal fermentation and microbial communities in sheep fed on high-forage diets. Zhou YW, McSweeney CS, Wang JK, Liu JX. Animal; 2012 May; 6(5):815-23. PubMed ID: 22558929 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. In Vivo Competitions between Fibrobacter succinogenes, Ruminococcus flavefaciens, and Ruminoccus albus in a Gnotobiotic Sheep Model Revealed by Multi-Omic Analyses. Yeoman CJ, Fields CJ, Lepercq P, Ruiz P, Forano E, White BA, Mosoni P. mBio; 2021 Mar 03; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 33658330 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term defaunation increases the abundance of cellulolytic ruminococci and methanogens but does not affect the bacterial and methanogen diversity in the rumen of sheep. Mosoni P, Martin C, Forano E, Morgavi DP. J Anim Sci; 2011 Mar 03; 89(3):783-91. PubMed ID: 21346137 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Development of a RT-qPCR method for the quantification of Fibrobacter succinogenes S85 glycoside hydrolase transcripts in the rumen content of gnotobiotic and conventional sheep. Béra-Maillet C, Mosoni P, Kwasiborski A, Suau F, Ribot Y, Forano E. J Microbiol Methods; 2009 Apr 03; 77(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 19318052 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Invited review: adhesion mechanisms of rumen cellulolytic bacteria. Miron J, Ben-Ghedalia D, Morrison M. J Dairy Sci; 2001 Jun 03; 84(6):1294-309. PubMed ID: 11417686 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of bean husk as an easily digestible fiber source for activating the fibrolytic rumen bacterium Fibrobacter succinogenes and rice straw digestion. Fuma R, Oyaizu S, Nukui Y, Ngwe T, Shinkai T, Koike S, Kobayashi Y. Anim Sci J; 2012 Oct 03; 83(10):696-703. PubMed ID: 23035709 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Kinetics of in sacco fiber-attachment of representative ruminal cellulolytic bacteria monitored by competitive PCR. Koike S, Pan J, Kobayashi Y, Tanaka K. J Dairy Sci; 2003 Apr 03; 86(4):1429-35. PubMed ID: 12741567 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Development and use of competitive PCR assays for the rumen cellulolytic bacteria: Fibrobacter succinogenes, Ruminococcus albus and Ruminococcus flavefaciens. Koike S, Kobayashi Y. FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2001 Nov 13; 204(2):361-6. PubMed ID: 11731149 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of real-time PCR technique in studying rumen cellulolytic bacteria population as affected by level of roughage in swamp buffalo. Wanapat M, Cherdthong A. Curr Microbiol; 2009 Apr 13; 58(4):294-9. PubMed ID: 19018588 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Novel molecular features of the fibrolytic intestinal bacterium Fibrobacter intestinalis not shared with Fibrobacter succinogenes as determined by suppressive subtractive hybridization. Qi M, Nelson KE, Daugherty SC, Nelson WC, Hance IR, Morrison M, Forsberg CW. J Bacteriol; 2005 Jun 13; 187(11):3739-51. PubMed ID: 15901698 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Diet-dependent shifts in the bacterial population of the rumen revealed with real-time PCR. Tajima K, Aminov RI, Nagamine T, Matsui H, Nakamura M, Benno Y. Appl Environ Microbiol; 2001 Jun 13; 67(6):2766-74. PubMed ID: 11375193 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Involvement of recently cultured group U2 bacterium in ruminal fiber digestion revealed by coculture with Fibrobacter succinogenes S85. Fukuma N, Koike S, Kobayashi Y. FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2012 Nov 13; 336(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 22849722 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Detection of novel Fibrobacter populations in landfill sites and determination of their relative abundance via quantitative PCR. McDonald JE, Lockhart RJ, Cox MJ, Allison HE, McCarthy AJ. Environ Microbiol; 2008 May 13; 10(5):1310-9. PubMed ID: 18266756 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Fibrolytic capabilities of ruminal bacterium Fibrobacter succinogenes in relation to its phylogenetic grouping. Shinkai T, Ohji R, Matsumoto N, Kobayashi Y. FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2009 May 13; 294(2):183-190. PubMed ID: 19431237 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. In vitro bacterial growth and in vivo ruminal microbiota populations associated with bloat in steers grazing wheat forage. Min BR, Pinchak WE, Anderson RC, Hume ME. J Anim Sci; 2006 Oct 13; 84(10):2873-82. PubMed ID: 16971591 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]