These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. Speech reception by listeners with real and simulated hearing impairment: effects of continuous and interrupted noise. Desloge JG, Reed CM, Braida LD, Perez ZD, Delhorne LA. J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):342-59. PubMed ID: 20649229 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners. Burk MH, Humes LE, Amos NE, Strauser LE. Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Extension and evaluation of a near-end listening enhancement algorithm for listeners with normal and impaired hearing. Rennies J, Drefs J, Hülsmeier D, Schepker H, Doclo S. J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2526. PubMed ID: 28464693 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Effects of the Carrier Phrase on Word Recognition Performances by Younger and Older Listeners Using Two Stimulus Paradigms. Wilson RH, Sanchez VA. J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Jun; 31(6):412-441. PubMed ID: 31968207 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Recovery from prior stimulation: masking of speech by interrupted noise for younger and older adults with normal hearing. Dubno JR, Horwitz AR, Ahlstrom JB. J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Apr; 113(4 Pt 1):2084-94. PubMed ID: 12703719 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The effect of spatial separation on informational masking of speech in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Arbogast TL, Mason CR, Kidd G. J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Apr; 117(4 Pt 1):2169-80. PubMed ID: 15898658 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Effects of age and hearing impairment on the ability to benefit from temporal and spectral modulation. Hall JW, Buss E, Grose JH, Roush PA. Ear Hear; 2012 Apr; 33(3):340-8. PubMed ID: 22237164 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Development of the Word Auditory Recognition and Recall Measure: A Working Memory Test for Use in Rehabilitative Audiology. Smith SL, Pichora-Fuller MK, Alexander G. Ear Hear; 2016 Apr; 37(6):e360-e376. PubMed ID: 27438869 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech. Dubno JR, Horwitz AR, Ahlstrom JB. Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Speech Recognition Abilities in Normal-Hearing Children 4 to 12 Years of Age in Stationary and Interrupted Noise. Koopmans WJA, Goverts ST, Smits C. Ear Hear; 2018 Feb; 39(6):1091-1103. PubMed ID: 29554035 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The interpretation of speech reception threshold data in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners: II. Fluctuating noise. Smits C, Festen JM. J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):3004-15. PubMed ID: 23654404 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]