These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
134 related items for PubMed ID: 20181511
41. A new instrument for measuring clinician satisfaction with electronic health records. Sockolow PS, Weiner JP, Bowles KH, Lehmann HP. Comput Inform Nurs; 2011 Oct; 29(10):574-85. PubMed ID: 21543972 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Use of a human factors approach to uncover informatics needs of nurses in documentation of care. Rogers ML, Sockolow PS, Bowles KH, Hand KE, George J. Int J Med Inform; 2013 Nov; 82(11):1068-74. PubMed ID: 24008175 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Introduction of an electronic medical record system into physician practice offices: why is it so #%!&-ing hard for everybody?-Part I. Lyons JP, Klasko S. J Med Pract Manage; 2011 Nov; 26(5):317-22. PubMed ID: 21595389 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Workflow viewpoints: Analysis of nursing workflow documentation in the electronic health record. Whittenburg L. J Healthc Inf Manag; 2010 Nov; 24(3):71-5. PubMed ID: 20677475 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Realizing electronic medical record benefits: an easy-to-do usability study. Harrington L, Porch L, Acosta K, Wilkens K. J Nurs Adm; 2011 Nov; 41(7-8):331-5. PubMed ID: 21799365 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. "Lost in translation": the challenges of seamless integration in nursing practices. Meum T. Int J Med Inform; 2013 May; 82(5):e200-8. PubMed ID: 23375707 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. A case study evaluation of a Critical Care Information System adoption using the socio-technical and fit approach. Yusof MM. Int J Med Inform; 2015 Jul; 84(7):486-99. PubMed ID: 25881560 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Evaluation of user adoption during three module deployments of region-wide electronic patient record systems. Janols R, Lind T, Göransson B, Sandblad B. Int J Med Inform; 2014 Jun; 83(6):438-49. PubMed ID: 24630924 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Learning from within to ensure a successful implementation of an electronic health record. Laramee AS, Bosek M, Kasprisin CA, Powers-Phaneuf T. Comput Inform Nurs; 2011 Aug; 29(8):468-77; quiz 478-9. PubMed ID: 21076282 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. The electronic patient record: a strategic planning framework. Gordon DB, Marafioti S, Carter M, Kunov H, Dolan A. Medinfo; 1995 Aug; 8 Pt 1():296. PubMed ID: 8591177 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. A nursing focus on EMR usability enhancing documentation of patient outcomes. Page CA, Schadler A. Nurs Clin North Am; 2014 Mar; 49(1):81-90. PubMed ID: 24485189 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Enhancing nursing practice by utilizing voice recognition for direct documentation. Fratzke J, Tucker S, Shedenhelm H, Arnold J, Belda T, Petera M. J Nurs Adm; 2014 Feb; 44(2):79-86. PubMed ID: 24451445 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Multi-disciplinary collaboration during ward rounds: embodied aspects of electronic medical record usage. Morrison C, Fitzpatrick G, Blackwell A. Int J Med Inform; 2011 Aug; 80(8):e96-111. PubMed ID: 21334969 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Cognitive analyses of a paper medical record and electronic medical record on the documentation of two nursing tasks: patient education and adherence assessment of insulin administration. Rinkus SM, Chitwood A. Proc AMIA Symp; 2002 Aug; ():657-61. PubMed ID: 12463905 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. What to expect from electronic patient record system implementation; lessons learned from published evidence. Priestman W, Sridharan S, Vigne H, Collins R, Seamer L, Sebire NJ. J Innov Health Inform; 2018 Jun 15; 25(2):92-104. PubMed ID: 30398452 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]