These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

848 related items for PubMed ID: 20182254

  • 1. A comparison of quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in hospitalized orthopaedic trauma patients.
    Collinge CA, Lebus G, Gardner MJ, Gehrig L.
    J Orthop Trauma; 2010 Mar; 24(3):176-80. PubMed ID: 20182254
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Calcaneal quantitative ultrasound compared with hip and femoral neck dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in people with a spinal cord injury.
    Schnitzer TJ, Wysocki N, Barkema D, Griffith J, Lent V, Romba M, Welbel R, Bhuva S, Manyam B, Linn S.
    PM R; 2012 Oct; 4(10):748-55. PubMed ID: 22841967
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Identifying postmenopausal women with osteoporosis by calcaneal ultrasound, metacarpal digital X-ray radiogrammetry and phalangeal radiographic absorptiometry: a comparative study.
    Boonen S, Nijs J, Borghs H, Peeters H, Vanderschueren D, Luyten FP.
    Osteoporos Int; 2005 Jan; 16(1):93-100. PubMed ID: 15197540
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of bone mineral density with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, quantitative ultrasound and single energy x-ray absorptiometry.
    El-Desouki MI, Sherafzal MS, Othman SA.
    Saudi Med J; 2005 Sep; 26(9):1346-50. PubMed ID: 16155646
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Assessment of a new quantitative ultrasound calcaneus measurement: precision and discrimination of hip fractures in elderly women compared with dual X-ray absorptiometry.
    He YQ, Fan B, Hans D, Li J, Wu CY, Njeh CF, Zhao S, Lu Y, Tsuda-Futami E, Fuerst T, Genant HK.
    Osteoporos Int; 2000 Sep; 11(4):354-60. PubMed ID: 10928226
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The utility of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, calcaneal quantitative ultrasound, and fracture risk indices (FRAX® and Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Instrument) for the identification of women with distal forearm or hip fractures: A pilot study.
    Esmaeilzadeh S, Cesme F, Oral A, Yaliman A, Sindel D.
    Endocr Res; 2016 Aug; 41(3):248-60. PubMed ID: 26864472
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Calcaneal ultrasound bone densitometry is not a useful tool to screen patients with inflammatory bowel disease at high risk for metabolic bone disease.
    Schwartz DA, Connolley CD, Koyama T, Wise PE, Herline AJ.
    Inflamm Bowel Dis; 2005 Aug; 11(8):749-54. PubMed ID: 16043991
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Device-specific thresholds to diagnose osteoporosis at the proximal femur: an approach to interpreting peripheral bone measurements in clinical practice.
    Clowes JA, Peel NF, Eastell R.
    Osteoporos Int; 2006 Aug; 17(9):1293-302. PubMed ID: 16810454
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 43.