These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


145 related items for PubMed ID: 20183128

  • 1. Applying the digital image correlation method to estimate the mechanical properties of bacterial biofilms subjected to a wall shear stress.
    Mathias JD, Stoodley P.
    Biofouling; 2009 Nov; 25(8):695-703. PubMed ID: 20183128
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Viscoelastic fluid description of bacterial biofilm material properties.
    Klapper I, Rupp CJ, Cargo R, Purvedorj B, Stoodley P.
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2002 Nov 05; 80(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 12226861
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Textural fingerprints: a comprehensive descriptor for biofilm structure development.
    Milferstedt K, Pons MN, Morgenroth E.
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2008 Aug 01; 100(5):889-901. PubMed ID: 18551529
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Biofilm material properties as related to shear-induced deformation and detachment phenomena.
    Stoodley P, Cargo R, Rupp CJ, Wilson S, Klapper I.
    J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol; 2002 Dec 01; 29(6):361-7. PubMed ID: 12483479
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The influence of fluid shear and AICI3 on the material properties of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 and Desulfovibrio sp. EX265 biofilms.
    Stoodley P, Jacobsen A, Dunsmore BC, Purevdorj B, Wilson S, Lappin-Scott HM, Costerton JW.
    Water Sci Technol; 2001 Dec 01; 43(6):113-20. PubMed ID: 11381956
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The influence of flow cell geometry related shear stresses on the distribution, structure and susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa 01 biofilms.
    Salek MM, Jones SM, Martinuzzi RJ.
    Biofouling; 2009 Nov 01; 25(8):711-25. PubMed ID: 20183130
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A novel microfluidic device for the in situ optical and mechanical analysis of bacterial biofilms.
    Mosier AP, Kaloyeros AE, Cady NC.
    J Microbiol Methods; 2012 Oct 01; 91(1):198-204. PubMed ID: 22796059
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Determination of biofilm mechanical properties from tensile tests performed using a micro-cantilever method.
    Aggarwal S, Hozalski RM.
    Biofouling; 2010 May 01; 26(4):479-86. PubMed ID: 20390563
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The influence of fluid shear on the structure and material properties of sulphate-reducing bacterial biofilms.
    Dunsmore BC, Jacobsen A, Hall-Stoodley L, Bass CJ, Lappin-Scott HM, Stoodley P.
    J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol; 2002 Dec 01; 29(6):347-53. PubMed ID: 12483477
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Influence of calcium ions on the mechanical properties of a model biofilm of mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
    Körstgens V, Flemming HC, Wingender J, Borchard W.
    Water Sci Technol; 2001 Dec 01; 43(6):49-57. PubMed ID: 11381972
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Resolution of axial shear strain elastography.
    Thitaikumar A, Righetti R, Krouskop TA, Ophir J.
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Oct 21; 51(20):5245-57. PubMed ID: 17019036
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Experimental investigation of the elastic-plastic deformation of mineralized lobster cuticle by digital image correlation.
    Sachs C, Fabritius H, Raabe D.
    J Struct Biol; 2006 Sep 21; 155(3):409-25. PubMed ID: 16899374
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Effect of wall shear rate on biofilm deposition and grazing in drinking water flow chambers.
    Paris T, Skali-Lami S, Block JC.
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2007 Aug 15; 97(6):1550-61. PubMed ID: 17216655
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Homogenization of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 biofilms visualized by freeze-substitution electron microscopy.
    Guélon T, Hunter RC, Mathias JD, Deffuant G.
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2013 May 15; 110(5):1405-18. PubMed ID: 23239457
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Effect of shear stress on growth, adhesion and biofilm formation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa with antibiotic-induced morphological changes.
    Fonseca AP, Sousa JC.
    Int J Antimicrob Agents; 2007 Sep 15; 30(3):236-41. PubMed ID: 17574822
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Development and testing of a novel microcantilever technique for measuring the cohesive strength of intact biofilms.
    Aggarwal S, Poppele EH, Hozalski RM.
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2010 Apr 01; 105(5):924-34. PubMed ID: 19953669
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Measuring local flow velocities and biofilm structure in biofilm systems with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
    Manz B, Volke F, Goll D, Horn H.
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2003 Nov 20; 84(4):424-32. PubMed ID: 14574699
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Impact of hydrodynamics on oral biofilm strength.
    Paramonova E, Kalmykowa OJ, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ, Sharma PK.
    J Dent Res; 2009 Oct 20; 88(10):922-6. PubMed ID: 19783800
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Cohesiveness and hydrodynamic properties of young drinking water biofilms.
    Abe Y, Skali-Lami S, Block JC, Francius G.
    Water Res; 2012 Mar 15; 46(4):1155-66. PubMed ID: 22221338
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. On the calculation of the elastic modulus of a biofilm streamer.
    Aravas N, Laspidou CS.
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2008 Sep 01; 101(1):196-200. PubMed ID: 18383138
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.