These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

476 related items for PubMed ID: 20188783

  • 1. Randomised trial of resin-based restorations in Class I and Class II beveled preparations in primary molars: 48-month results.
    Alves dos Santos MP, Luiz RR, Maia LC.
    J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):451-9. PubMed ID: 20188783
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Class II restorations with a polyacid-modified composite resin in primary molars placed in a dental practice: results of a two-year clinical evaluation.
    Attin T, Opatowski A, Meyer C, Zingg-Meyer B, Mönting JS.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Jun; 25(4):259-64. PubMed ID: 11203828
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Three-year follow up assessment of Class II restorations in primary molars with a polyacid-modified composite resin and a hybrid composite.
    Attin T, Opatowski A, Meyer C, Zingg-Meyer B, Buchalla W, Mönting JS.
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 11572292
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Clinical evaluation of composite and compomer restorations in primary teeth: 24-month results.
    Pascon FM, Kantovitz KR, Caldo-Teixeira AS, Borges AF, Silva TN, Puppin-Rontani RM, Garcia-Godoy F.
    J Dent; 2006 Jul; 34(6):381-8. PubMed ID: 16242232
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A randomized trial of resin-based restorations in class I and class II beveled preparations in primary molars: 24-month results.
    dos Santos MP, Passos M, Luiz RR, Maia LC.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2009 Feb; 140(2):156-66; quiz 247-8. PubMed ID: 19188412
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Flowable resin composite as a class II restorative in primary molars: A two-year clinical evaluation.
    Andersson-Wenckert I, Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K.
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2006 Nov; 64(6):334-40. PubMed ID: 17123909
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Split mouth randomized controlled clinical trial of beveled cavity preparations in primary molars: an 18-Month follow up.
    Oliveira CA, Dias PF, Dos Santos MP, Maia LC.
    J Dent; 2008 Sep; 36(9):754-8. PubMed ID: 18579283
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Randomized clinical trial of adhesive restorations in primary molars. 18-month results.
    Casagrande L, Dalpian DM, Ardenghi TM, Zanatta FB, Balbinot CE, García-Godoy F, De Araujo FB.
    Am J Dent; 2013 Dec; 26(6):351-5. PubMed ID: 24640441
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Direct resin composite restorations versus indirect composite inlays: one-year results.
    Mendonça JS, Neto RG, Santiago SL, Lauris JR, Navarro MF, de Carvalho RM.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 May 01; 11(3):025-32. PubMed ID: 20461321
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Durability of resin composite restorations in high C-factor cavities: a 12-year follow-up.
    van Dijken JW.
    J Dent; 2010 Jun 01; 38(6):469-74. PubMed ID: 20193727
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Clinical evaluation of glass-ionomer tunnel restorations in primary molars: 36 months results.
    Markovic D, Peric T.
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Mar 01; 53(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 18304240
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Nine-year evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite/resin composite open sandwich technique in Class II cavities.
    Lindberg A, van Dijken JW, Lindberg M.
    J Dent; 2007 Feb 01; 35(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 16956709
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Double-blind randomized clinical trial of posterior composite restorations with or without bevel: 6-month follow-up.
    Coelho-de-Souza FH, Klein-Júnior CA, Camargo JC, Beskow T, Balestrin MD, Demarco FF.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Mar 01; 11(2):001-8. PubMed ID: 20228981
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 17-year findings.
    da Rosa Rodolpho PA, Cenci MS, Donassollo TA, Loguércio AD, Demarco FF.
    J Dent; 2006 Aug 01; 34(7):427-35. PubMed ID: 16314023
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Clinical evaluation of a compomer and an amalgam primary teeth class II restorations: a 2-year comparative study.
    Kavvadia K, Kakaboura A, Vanderas AP, Papagiannoulis L.
    Pediatr Dent; 2004 Aug 01; 26(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 15185806
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Two-year clinical evaluation of four polyacid-modified resin composites and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in Class V lesions.
    Ermiş RB.
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Aug 01; 33(7):542-8. PubMed ID: 12165991
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Survival of self-etch adhesive Class II composite restorations using ART and conventional cavity preparations in primary molars.
    Eden E, Topaloglu-Ak A, Frencken JE, van't Hof M.
    Am J Dent; 2006 Dec 01; 19(6):359-63. PubMed ID: 17212078
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A Retrospective Study of the 3-Year Survival Rate of Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cement Class II Restorations in Primary Molars.
    Webman M, Mulki E, Roldan R, Arevalo O, Roberts JF, Garcia-Godoy F.
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016 Dec 01; 40(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 26696100
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations for glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars: one-year results.
    Yip HK, Smales RJ, Yu C, Gao XJ, Deng DM.
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Jan 01; 33(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 11887531
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Clinical performance of posterior compomer restorations over 4 years.
    Krämer N, García-Godoy F, Reinelt C, Frankenberger R.
    Am J Dent; 2006 Feb 01; 19(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 16555660
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 24.