These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

66 related items for PubMed ID: 20192874

  • 1. Assessing the benefit of adaptive null-steering using real-world signals.
    Woods WS, Merks I, Zhang T, Fitz K, Edwards B.
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Jun; 49(6):434-43. PubMed ID: 20192874
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Understanding compression: modeling the effects of dynamic-range compression in hearing aids.
    Kates JM.
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Jun; 49(6):395-409. PubMed ID: 20225931
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Impact of visual cues on directional benefit and preference: Part II--field tests.
    Wu YH, Bentler RA.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 19773657
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Real-time multiband dynamic compression and noise reduction for binaural hearing aids.
    Kollmeier B, Peissig J, Hohmann V.
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993 Feb; 30(1):82-94. PubMed ID: 8263832
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Improvement in speech intelligibility in noise employing an adaptive filter with normal and hearing-impaired subjects.
    Brey RH, Robinette MS, Chabries DM, Christiansen RW.
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987 Feb; 24(4):75-86. PubMed ID: 3430392
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Binaural noise-reduction hearing aid scheme with real-time processing in the frequency domain.
    Kollmeier B, Peissig J, Hohmann V.
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993 Feb; 38():28-38. PubMed ID: 8153562
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Impact of visual cues on directional benefit and preference: Part I--laboratory tests.
    Wu YH, Bentler RA.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):22-34. PubMed ID: 19864954
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Using a signal cancellation technique to assess adaptive directivity of hearing aids.
    Wu YH, Bentler RA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jul; 122(1):496-511. PubMed ID: 17614507
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Speech-reception threshold in noise for hearing-impaired listeners in conditions with a varying amplitude-frequency response.
    van Dijkhuizen JN, Festen JM, Plomp R.
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990 Jul; 469():202-6. PubMed ID: 2356728
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Wind noise in hearing aids: II. Effect of microphone directivity.
    Chung K.
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Jan; 51(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 22111542
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. New developments in speech pattern element hearing aids for the profoundly deaf.
    Faulkner A, Walliker JR, Howard IS, Ball V, Fourcin AJ.
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993 Jan; 38():124-35. PubMed ID: 8153558
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test.
    Cameron S, Dillon H, Newall P.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The efficacy of a multichannel hearing aid in which the gain is controlled by the minima in the temporal signal envelope.
    Festen JM, van Dijkhuizen JN, Plomp R.
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993 Feb; 38():101-10. PubMed ID: 8153556
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Effects of noise source configuration on directional benefit using symmetric and asymmetric directional hearing aid fittings.
    Hornsby BW, Ricketts TA.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 17496669
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids.
    Ricketts T, Henry P, Gnewikow D.
    Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):424-39. PubMed ID: 14534412
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Speech discrimination with an 8-channel compression hearing aid and conventional aids in background of speech-band noise.
    Yund EW, Simon HJ, Efron R.
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987 Oct; 24(4):161-80. PubMed ID: 3430375
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Evaluation of array-processing algorithms for a headband hearing aid.
    Greenberg JE, Desloge JG, Zurek PM.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Mar; 113(3):1646-57. PubMed ID: 12656398
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparison of performance on the hearing in noise test using directional microphones and digital noise reduction algorithms.
    Nordrum S, Erler S, Garstecki D, Dhar S.
    Am J Audiol; 2006 Jun; 15(1):81-91. PubMed ID: 16803795
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Considerations on adaptive gain and frequency response in hearing aids.
    Festen JM, van Dijkhuizen JN, Plomp R.
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990 Jun; 469():196-201. PubMed ID: 2356727
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Effects of in-the-ear microphone directionality on sound direction identification.
    Chung K, Neuman AC, Higgins M.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Apr; 123(4):2264-75. PubMed ID: 18397031
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 4.