These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1491 related items for PubMed ID: 20193727

  • 1. Durability of resin composite restorations in high C-factor cavities: a 12-year follow-up.
    van Dijken JW.
    J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):469-74. PubMed ID: 20193727
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Nine-year evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite/resin composite open sandwich technique in Class II cavities.
    Lindberg A, van Dijken JW, Lindberg M.
    J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 16956709
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A 6-year clinical evaluation of Class I poly-acid modified resin composite/resin composite laminate restorations cured with a two-step curing technique.
    van Dijken JW.
    Dent Mater; 2003 Jul; 19(5):423-8. PubMed ID: 12742438
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Eighteen-month clinical evaluation of microhybrid, packable and nanofilled resin composites in Class I restorations.
    Sadeghi M, Lynch CD, Shahamat N.
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Jul; 37(7):532-7. PubMed ID: 20202097
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. 3-year evaluation of a new open sandwich technique in Class II cavities.
    Lindberg A, van Dijken JW, Lindberg M.
    Am J Dent; 2003 Feb; 16(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 12744410
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Direct resin composite restorations versus indirect composite inlays: one-year results.
    Mendonça JS, Neto RG, Santiago SL, Lauris JR, Navarro MF, de Carvalho RM.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 May 01; 11(3):025-32. PubMed ID: 20461321
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Clinical evaluation of polyacid-modified resin composite posterior restorations: one-year results.
    Luo Y, Lo EC, Fang DT, Wei SH.
    Quintessence Int; 2000 Oct 01; 31(9):630-6. PubMed ID: 11203987
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Randomised trial of resin-based restorations in Class I and Class II beveled preparations in primary molars: 48-month results.
    Alves dos Santos MP, Luiz RR, Maia LC.
    J Dent; 2010 Jun 01; 38(6):451-9. PubMed ID: 20188783
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (Dyract) in class III cavities: three-year results.
    Demirci M, Ersev H, Uçok M.
    Oper Dent; 2002 Jun 01; 27(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 12022451
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A 15-year randomized controlled study of a reduced shrinkage stress resin composite.
    van Dijken JW, Lindberg A.
    Dent Mater; 2015 Sep 01; 31(9):1150-8. PubMed ID: 26205382
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Directed polymerization shrinkage versus a horizontal incremental filling technique: interfacial adaptation in vivo in Class II cavities.
    van Dijken JW, Hörstedt P, Waern R.
    Am J Dent; 1998 Aug 01; 11(4):165-72. PubMed ID: 10388370
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Durability of extensive Class II open-sandwich restorations with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement after 6 years.
    Andersson-Wenckert IE, van Dijken JW, Kieri C.
    Am J Dent; 2004 Feb 01; 17(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 15241909
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Double-blind randomized clinical trial of posterior composite restorations with or without bevel: 6-month follow-up.
    Coelho-de-Souza FH, Klein-Júnior CA, Camargo JC, Beskow T, Balestrin MD, Demarco FF.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Mar 01; 11(2):001-8. PubMed ID: 20228981
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Six-year clinical evaluation of packable composite restorations.
    Kiremitci A, Alpaslan T, Gurgan S.
    Oper Dent; 2009 Mar 01; 34(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 19192832
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Clinical performance of posterior compomer restorations over 4 years.
    Krämer N, García-Godoy F, Reinelt C, Frankenberger R.
    Am J Dent; 2006 Feb 01; 19(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 16555660
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A 7-year randomized prospective study of a one-step self-etching adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions. The effect of curing modes and restorative material.
    van Dijken JW, Pallesen U.
    J Dent; 2012 Dec 01; 40(12):1060-7. PubMed ID: 22955004
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. 3-year clinical evaluation of a compomer, a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite in Class III restorations.
    van Dijken JW.
    Am J Dent; 1996 Oct 01; 9(5):195-8. PubMed ID: 9545903
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Three-year follow up assessment of Class II restorations in primary molars with a polyacid-modified composite resin and a hybrid composite.
    Attin T, Opatowski A, Meyer C, Zingg-Meyer B, Buchalla W, Mönting JS.
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun 01; 14(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 11572292
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Assessment of laminate technique using glass ionomer and resin composite for restoration of root filled teeth.
    Taha NA, Palamara JE, Messer HH.
    J Dent; 2012 Aug 01; 40(8):617-23. PubMed ID: 22521705
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Nanohybrid composite vs. fine hybrid composite in extended class II cavities: clinical and microscopic results after 2 years.
    Krämer N, Reinelt C, García-Godoy F, Taschner M, Petschelt A, Frankenberger R.
    Am J Dent; 2009 Aug 01; 22(4):228-34. PubMed ID: 19824560
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 75.