These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

288 related items for PubMed ID: 20197084

  • 1. Intelligibility of interrupted and interleaved speech for normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implantees.
    Gnansia D, Pressnitzer D, Péan V, Meyer B, Lorenzi C.
    Hear Res; 2010 Jun 14; 265(1-2):46-53. PubMed ID: 20197084
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bernstein JG, Grant KW.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May 14; 125(5):3358-72. PubMed ID: 19425676
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The effects of binaural spectral resolution mismatch on Mandarin speech perception in simulated electric hearing.
    Chen F, Wong LL, Tahmina Q, Azimi B, Hu Y.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug 14; 132(2):EL142-8. PubMed ID: 22894313
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH, Humes LE, Amos NE, Strauser LE.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun 14; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Effects of periodic masker interruption on the intelligibility of interrupted speech.
    Iyer N, Brungart DS, Simpson BD.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep 14; 122(3):1693. PubMed ID: 17927429
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The potential of onset enhancement for increased speech intelligibility in auditory prostheses.
    Koning R, Wouters J.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct 14; 132(4):2569-81. PubMed ID: 23039450
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Effects of interferer facing orientation on speech perception by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Strelcyk O, Pentony S, Kalluri S, Edwards B.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar 14; 135(3):1419-32. PubMed ID: 24606279
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Effect of spatial separation, extended bandwidth, and compression speed on intelligibility in a competing-speech task.
    Moore BC, Füllgrabe C, Stone MA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul 14; 128(1):360-71. PubMed ID: 20649230
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Advantage of bimodal fitting in prosody perception for children using a cochlear implant and a hearing aid.
    Straatman LV, Rietveld AC, Beijen J, Mylanus EA, Mens LH.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct 14; 128(4):1884-95. PubMed ID: 20968360
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Improving word recognition in noise among hearing-impaired subjects with a single-channel cochlear noise-reduction algorithm.
    Fink N, Furst M, Muchnik C.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep 14; 132(3):1718-31. PubMed ID: 22978899
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparison of the fine structure processing (FSP) strategy and the CIS strategy used in the MED-EL cochlear implant system: speech intelligibility and music sound quality.
    Magnusson L.
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Apr 14; 50(4):279-87. PubMed ID: 21190508
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Can basic auditory and cognitive measures predict hearing-impaired listeners' localization and spatial speech recognition abilities?
    Neher T, Laugesen S, Jensen NS, Kragelund L.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep 14; 130(3):1542-58. PubMed ID: 21895093
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Understanding the effect of noise on electrical stimulation sequences in cochlear implants and its impact on speech intelligibility.
    Qazi OU, van Dijk B, Moonen M, Wouters J.
    Hear Res; 2013 May 14; 299():79-87. PubMed ID: 23396271
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Phoneme recognition in vocoded maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
    Phatak SA, Grant KW.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug 14; 136(2):859-66. PubMed ID: 25096119
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The binaural intelligibility level difference in hearing-impaired listeners: the role of supra-threshold deficits.
    Goverts ST, Houtgast T.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 May 14; 127(5):3073-84. PubMed ID: 21117756
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Speech intelligibility in background noise with ideal binary time-frequency masking.
    Wang D, Kjems U, Pedersen MS, Boldt JB, Lunner T.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Apr 14; 125(4):2336-47. PubMed ID: 19354408
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.