These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

85 related items for PubMed ID: 20200100

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Mammography dosimetry using an in-house developed polymethyl methacrylate phantom.
    Sharma R, Sharma SD, Mayya YS, Chourasiya G.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Aug; 151(2):379-85. PubMed ID: 22232773
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Thermoluminescent dosimeters for in vivo measurement of radiation exposure and related dose in mammography.
    Omran HA.
    Radiol Technol; 1982 Aug; 53(5):383-92. PubMed ID: 6927768
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Dosimetry with thermoluminescence during mammography].
    Tahiri DS, Gérard JP, Ginestet C, Sentenac I, Berger M.
    J Radiol; 1990 Jan; 71(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 2313626
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [New aspects in evaluation of the average-absorbed dose of the parenchyma in mammography (author's transl)].
    Schneider G, Kindl P, Spreizer H.
    Rofo; 1978 Jan; 128(1):82-6. PubMed ID: 146669
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [Radiation exposure in full-field digital mammography with a flat-panel x-ray detector based on amorphous silicon in comparison with conventional screen-film mammography].
    Hermann KP, Obenauer S, Grabbe E.
    Rofo; 2000 Nov; 172(11):940-5. PubMed ID: 11142129
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Absorption dose in scintimammography and in X-rays mammography].
    Lyra M, Vamvakas I, Gavriilelli M, Chatzigiannis C.
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2010 Nov; 13(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 20411183
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Dosimetry in scintimammography by (99m)Tc-MIBI, (99m)Tc-Tetrofosmin, (99m)Tc-(V)DMSA and 201TlCl compared with X-rays mammography].
    Lyra M, Vamvakas I.
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2009 Nov; 12(2):184-8. PubMed ID: 19675881
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Radiation exposure in full-field digital mammography with a selenium flat-panel detector].
    Gosch D, Jendrass S, Scholz M, Kahn T.
    Rofo; 2006 Jul; 178(7):693-7. PubMed ID: 16761214
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Characteristics of dosemeter types for skin dose measurements in practice.
    Van Dam J, Bosmans H, Marchal G, Wambersie A.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005 Jul; 117(1-3):185-9. PubMed ID: 16464834
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Towards in vivo TLD dosimetry in mammography.
    Warren-Forward HM, Duggan L.
    Br J Radiol; 2004 May; 77(917):426-32. PubMed ID: 15121707
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Absorbed dose measurements of a handheld 50 kVP X-ray source in water with thermoluminescence dosemeters.
    Soares C, Drupieski C, Wingert B, Pritchett G, Pagonis V, O'Brien M, Sliski A, Bilski P, Olko P.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006 May; 120(1-4):78-82. PubMed ID: 16735571
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.