These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
963 related items for PubMed ID: 20209191
1. Evaluation of stresses occurring on three different zirconia dental implants: three-dimensional finite element analysis. Caglar A, Bal BT, Aydin C, Yilmaz H, Ozkan S. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(1):95-103. PubMed ID: 20209191 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of titanium and yttrium-stabilized zirconium dioxide abutments and implants. Çaglar A, Bal BT, Karakoca S, Aydın C, Yılmaz H, Sarısoy S. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):961-9. PubMed ID: 22010077 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Finite element analysis of stress distribution with splinted and nonsplinted maxillary anterior fixed prostheses supported by zirconia or titanium implants. Bal BT, Cağlar A, Aydin C, Yilmaz H, Bankoğlu M, Eser A. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(1):e27-38. PubMed ID: 23377079 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-dimensional computerized stress analysis of commercially pure titanium and yttrium-partially stabilized zirconia implants. Kohal RJ, Papavasiliou G, Kamposiora P, Tripodakis A, Strub JR. Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 11951811 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The Effect of Three Different Crown Heights and Two Different Bone Types on Implants Placed in the Posterior Maxilla: Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis. Cinar D, Imirzalioglu P. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(2):e1-e10. PubMed ID: 27004295 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Titanium versus zirconia implants supporting maxillary overdentures: three-dimensional finite element analysis. Osman RB, Elkhadem AH, Ma S, Swain MV. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(5):e198-208. PubMed ID: 24066336 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Stress distribution on scalloped implants with different microthread and connection configurations using three-dimensional finite element analysis. Choi KS, Park SH, Lee JH, Jeon YC, Yun MJ, Jeong CM. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):e29-38. PubMed ID: 22616069 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of dental and zygomatic implants on stress distribution in maxillary defects: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis study. Korkmaz FM, Korkmaz YT, Yaluğ S, Korkmaz T. J Oral Implantol; 2012 Oct; 38(5):557-67. PubMed ID: 20925533 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Influences of internal tapered abutment designs on bone stresses around a dental implant: three-dimensional finite element method with statistical evaluation. Chu CM, Huang HL, Hsu JT, Fuh LJ. J Periodontol; 2012 Jan; 83(1):111-8. PubMed ID: 21563947 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Regular and platform switching: bone stress analysis varying implant type. Gurgel-Juarez NC, de Almeida EO, Rocha EP, Freitas AC, Anchieta RB, de Vargas LC, Kina S, França FM. J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 22372756 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of dental implant cross-sectional design on cortical bone structure using finite element analysis. Abu-Hammad O, Khraisat A, Dar-Odeh N, El-Maaytah M. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Dec; 9(4):217-21. PubMed ID: 18031443 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of stress distributions occurring on zirconia and titanium implant-supported prostheses: A three-dimensional finite element analysis. Bankoğlu Güngör M, Yılmaz H. J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Sep; 116(3):346-55. PubMed ID: 27063944 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]