These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


148 related items for PubMed ID: 20216342

  • 1. The restoration of lumbar intervertebral disc load distribution: a comparison of three nucleus replacement technologies.
    Dahl MC, Ahrens M, Sherman JE, Martz EO.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jul 01; 35(15):1445-53. PubMed ID: 20216342
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Total disc replacement positioning affects facet contact forces and vertebral body strains.
    Rundell SA, Auerbach JD, Balderston RA, Kurtz SM.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Nov 01; 33(23):2510-7. PubMed ID: 18978591
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. In situ contact analysis of the prosthesis components of Prodisc-L in lumbar spine following total disc replacement.
    Chen WM, Park C, Lee K, Lee S.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Sep 15; 34(20):E716-23. PubMed ID: 19752690
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Stress analysis of the interface between cervical vertebrae end plates and the Bryan, Prestige LP, and ProDisc-C cervical disc prostheses: an in vivo image-based finite element study.
    Lin CY, Kang H, Rouleau JP, Hollister SJ, Marca FL.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jul 01; 34(15):1554-60. PubMed ID: 19564765
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Biomechanical comparison of a two-level Maverick disc replacement with a hybrid one-level disc replacement and one-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Erkan S, Rivera Y, Wu C, Mehbod AA, Transfeldt EE.
    Spine J; 2009 Oct 01; 9(10):830-5. PubMed ID: 19477692
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparative charge analysis of one- and two-level lumbar total disc arthroplasty versus circumferential lumbar fusion.
    Levin DA, Bendo JA, Quirno M, Errico T, Goldstein J, Spivak J.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec 01; 32(25):2905-9. PubMed ID: 18246016
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Dynamic bulging of intervertebral discs in the degenerative lumbar spine.
    Zou J, Yang H, Miyazaki M, Morishita Y, Wei F, McGovern S, Wang JC.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Nov 01; 34(23):2545-50. PubMed ID: 19841611
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The effect of implant size and device keel on vertebral compression properties in lumbar total disc replacement.
    Auerbach JD, Ballester CM, Hammond F, Carine ET, Balderston RA, Elliott DM.
    Spine J; 2010 Apr 01; 10(4):333-40. PubMed ID: 20362251
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Validated finite element analysis of the maverick total disc prosthesis.
    Le Huec JC, Lafage V, Bonnet X, Lavaste F, Josse L, Liu M, Skalli W.
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Jun 01; 23(4):249-57. PubMed ID: 20068471
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Biomechanical rationale for using polyetheretherketone (PEEK) spacers for lumbar interbody fusion-A finite element study.
    Vadapalli S, Sairyo K, Goel VK, Robon M, Biyani A, Khandha A, Ebraheim NA.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Dec 15; 31(26):E992-8. PubMed ID: 17172990
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.