These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

143 related items for PubMed ID: 2021851

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A prospective randomized trial of hand-sutured versus mechanically stapled anastomoses for gastroduodenostomy after distal gastrectomy.
    Hori S, Ochiai T, Gunji Y, Hayashi H, Suzuki T.
    Gastric Cancer; 2004; 7(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 15052436
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The stapled gastrointestinal tract anastomosis: incidence of postoperative complications compared with the sutured anastomosis.
    Chassin JL, Rifkind KM, Sussman B, Kassel B, Fingaret A, Drager S, Chassin PS.
    Ann Surg; 1978 Nov; 188(5):689-96. PubMed ID: 718296
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Staples or sutures for low colorectal anastomoses: a prospective randomized trial.
    McGinn FP, Gartell PC, Clifford PC, Brunton FJ.
    Br J Surg; 1985 Aug; 72(8):603-5. PubMed ID: 3896372
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Sutures, staplers, leaks and strictures. A review of anastomoses in oesophageal resection at Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast 1977-1986.
    McManus KG, Ritchie AJ, McGuigan J, Stevenson HM, Gibbons JR.
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1990 Aug; 4(2):97-100. PubMed ID: 2184859
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Low colorectal anastomoses. An experimental assessment of two sutured and two stapled techniques.
    Templeton JL, McKelvey ST.
    Dis Colon Rectum; 1985 Jan; 28(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 3882359
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Stapling instruments in upper gastrointestinal surgery: a retrospective study of 362 cases.
    Lowdon IM, Gear MW, Kilby JO.
    Br J Surg; 1982 Jun; 69(6):333-5. PubMed ID: 6979372
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Surgical treatment of carcinoma of the esophagus: automatic suture versus manual suture].
    Pimenta AP, Cardoso VM, Rodrigues JS.
    Arq Gastroenterol; 1982 Jun; 19(3):113-9. PubMed ID: 6764358
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Advantages and disadvantages of mechanical vs. manual anastomosis in colorectal surgery. A prospective study.
    Cajozzo M, Compagno G, DiTora P, Spallitta SI, Bazan P.
    Acta Chir Scand; 1990 Feb; 156(2):167-9. PubMed ID: 2184635
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Stapler versus manual anastomosis in gastrointestinal surgery].
    Moreno-Gonzalez E, Vara-Thorbeck R.
    Langenbecks Arch Chir; 1987 Feb; 372():99-103. PubMed ID: 3323743
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Stapled versus hand-sewn anastomoses in emergency intestinal surgery: results of a prospective randomized study.
    Catena F, La Donna M, Gagliardi S, Avanzolini A, Taffurelli M.
    Surg Today; 2004 Feb; 34(2):123-6. PubMed ID: 14745611
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.