These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

314 related items for PubMed ID: 2021852

  • 1. Comparison of a single layer continuous hand-sewn method and circular stapling in 580 oesophageal anastomoses.
    Fok M, Ah-Chong AK, Cheng SW, Wong J.
    Br J Surg; 1991 Mar; 78(3):342-5. PubMed ID: 2021852
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Propensity-matched analysis of three techniques for intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis.
    Blackmon SH, Correa AM, Wynn B, Hofstetter WL, Martin LW, Mehran RJ, Rice DC, Swisher SG, Walsh GL, Roth JA, Vaporciyan AA.
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2007 May; 83(5):1805-13; discussion 1813. PubMed ID: 17462404
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparison of manual and mechanical cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
    Hsu HH, Chen JS, Huang PM, Lee JM, Lee YC.
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Jun; 25(6):1097-101. PubMed ID: 15145015
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A change in clinical practice: a partially stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis reduces morbidity and improves functional outcome after esophagectomy for cancer.
    Kondra J, Ong SR, Clifton J, Evans K, Finley RJ, Yee J.
    Dis Esophagus; 2008 Jun; 21(5):422-9. PubMed ID: 19125796
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Experiences with 216 manual esophageal anastomoses and with mechanical single and double row suture technique (SPTU, EEA, ILS) in stomach cancers].
    Damanakis K, Kantartzis M, Schenk R, Wissenberg V.
    Zentralbl Chir; 1992 Jun; 117(11):583-8. PubMed ID: 1471444
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Esophagogastrectomy: the influence of stapled versus hand-sewn anastomosis on outcome.
    Behzadi A, Nichols FC, Cassivi SD, Deschamps C, Allen MS, Pairolero PC.
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2005 Nov; 9(8):1031-40; discussion 1040-2. PubMed ID: 16269373
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled in esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective randomized study.
    Luechakiettisak P, Kasetsunthorn S.
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 May; 91(5):681-5. PubMed ID: 18672632
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.