These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

332 related items for PubMed ID: 20225931

  • 21. Ranking hearing aid input-output functions for understanding low-, conversational-, and high-level speech in multitalker babble.
    Chung K, Killion MC, Christensen LA.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Apr; 50(2):304-22. PubMed ID: 17463231
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Speech intelligibility in background noise with ideal binary time-frequency masking.
    Wang D, Kjems U, Pedersen MS, Boldt JB, Lunner T.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Apr; 125(4):2336-47. PubMed ID: 19354408
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Speech discrimination with an 8-channel compression hearing aid and conventional aids in background of speech-band noise.
    Yund EW, Simon HJ, Efron R.
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987 Apr; 24(4):161-80. PubMed ID: 3430375
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Auditory models of suprathreshold distortion and speech intelligibility in persons with impaired hearing.
    Bernstein JG, Summers V, Grassi E, Grant KW.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):307-28. PubMed ID: 23636211
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. The effect of filtering on the intelligibility and quality of speech in noise.
    Neuman AC, Schwander TJ.
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987 Apr; 24(4):127-34. PubMed ID: 3430372
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Multichannel syllabic compression for severely impaired listeners.
    De Gennaro S, Braida LD, Durlach NI.
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1986 Jan; 23(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 3958996
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Quantifying the effect of compression hearing aid release time on speech acoustics and intelligibility.
    Jenstad LM, Souza PE.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):651-67. PubMed ID: 16197279
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Temporal resolution in regions of normal hearing and speech perception in noise for adults with sloping high-frequency hearing loss.
    Feng Y, Yin S, Kiefte M, Wang J.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):115-25. PubMed ID: 19816181
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Children's speech recognition scores: the Speech Intelligibility Index and proficiency factors for age and hearing level.
    Scollie SD.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):543-56. PubMed ID: 18469717
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. The effect of compression speed on intelligibility: simulated hearing-aid processing with and without original temporal fine structure information.
    Hopkins K, King A, Moore BC.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1592-601. PubMed ID: 22978888
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Effects of noise, nonlinear processing, and linear filtering on perceived music quality.
    Arehart KH, Kates JM, Anderson MC.
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Mar; 50(3):177-90. PubMed ID: 21319935
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. New developments in speech pattern element hearing aids for the profoundly deaf.
    Faulkner A, Walliker JR, Howard IS, Ball V, Fourcin AJ.
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993 Mar; 38():124-35. PubMed ID: 8153558
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Large-scale training to increase speech intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners in novel noises.
    Chen J, Wang Y, Yoho SE, Wang D, Healy EW.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2604. PubMed ID: 27250154
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Compression and expansion of the temporal envelope: evaluation of speech intelligibility and sound quality.
    van Buuren RA, Festen JM, Houtgast T.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 May; 105(5):2903-13. PubMed ID: 10335639
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Acoustical and Perceptual Comparison of Noise Reduction and Compression in Hearing Aids.
    Brons I, Houben R, Dreschler WA.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2015 Aug 01; 58(4):1363-76. PubMed ID: 26090648
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. The influence of spectral characteristics of early reflections on speech intelligibility.
    Arweiler I, Buchholz JM.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Aug 01; 130(2):996-1005. PubMed ID: 21877812
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Improving speech audibility with wide dynamic range compression in listeners with severe sensorineural loss.
    Souza PE, Bishop RD.
    Ear Hear; 1999 Dec 01; 20(6):461-70. PubMed ID: 10613384
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Predicting the effect of hearing loss and audibility on amplified speech reception in a multi-talker listening scenario.
    Woods WS, Kalluri S, Pentony S, Nooraei N.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jun 01; 133(6):4268-78. PubMed ID: 23742377
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Acoustic and perceptual effects of amplitude and frequency compression on high-frequency speech.
    Alexander JM, Rallapalli V.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Aug 01; 142(2):908. PubMed ID: 28863610
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Benefit from, and acclimatization to, frequency compression hearing aids in experienced adult hearing-aid users.
    Ellis RJ, Munro KJ.
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jan 01; 54(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 25470620
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.