These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. Reporting of fatal adverse drug reactions. Liu BA, Knowles SR, Mittmann N, Einarson T, Shear NH. Can J Clin Pharmacol; 2001; 8(2):84-8. PubMed ID: 11493936 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Reports of hyperkalemia after publication of RALES--a pharmacovigilance study. Hauben M, Reich L, Gerrits CM. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2006 Nov; 15(11):775-83. PubMed ID: 16804951 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Reevaluating the safety profile of pediatrics: a comparison of computerized adverse drug event surveillance and voluntary reporting in the pediatric environment. Ferranti J, Horvath MM, Cozart H, Whitehurst J, Eckstrand J. Pediatrics; 2008 May; 121(5):e1201-7. PubMed ID: 18450863 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Does reporting of coronary artery bypass grafting from administrative databases accurately reflect actual clinical outcomes? Mack MJ, Herbert M, Prince S, Dewey TM, Magee MJ, Edgerton JR. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Jun; 129(6):1309-17. PubMed ID: 15942571 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of pediatric cardiac surgical mortality rates from national administrative data to contemporary clinical standards. Welke KF, Diggs BS, Karamlou T, Ungerleider RM. Ann Thorac Surg; 2009 Jan; 87(1):216-22; discussion 222-3. PubMed ID: 19101301 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A report card system using error profile analysis and concurrent morbidity and mortality review: surgical outcome analysis, part II. Antonacci AC, Lam S, Lavarias V, Homel P, Eavey RA. J Surg Res; 2009 May 01; 153(1):95-104. PubMed ID: 18511079 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Postmarketing hepatic adverse event experience with PEGylated/non-PEGylated drugs: a disproportionality analysis. Hauben M, Vegni F, Reich L, Younus M. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2007 Nov 01; 19(11):934-41. PubMed ID: 18049161 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Benchmarking surgical incident reports using a database and a triage system to reduce adverse outcomes. Antonacci AC, Lam S, Lavarias V, Homel P, Eavey RD. Arch Surg; 2008 Dec 01; 143(12):1192-7. PubMed ID: 19075171 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Effectiveness of routine reporting to identify minor and serious adverse outcomes in surgical patients. Marang-van de Mheen PJ, van Hanegem N, Kievit J. Qual Saf Health Care; 2005 Oct 01; 14(5):378-82. PubMed ID: 16195574 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Identification of surgical complications and deaths: an assessment of the traditional surgical morbidity and mortality conference compared with the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Hutter MM, Rowell KS, Devaney LA, Sokal SM, Warshaw AL, Abbott WM, Hodin RA. J Am Coll Surg; 2006 Nov 01; 203(5):618-24. PubMed ID: 17084322 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Data mining on electronic health record databases for signal detection in pharmacovigilance: which events to monitor? Trifirò G, Pariente A, Coloma PM, Kors JA, Polimeni G, Miremont-Salamé G, Catania MA, Salvo F, David A, Moore N, Caputi AP, Sturkenboom M, Molokhia M, Hippisley-Cox J, Acedo CD, van der Lei J, Fourrier-Reglat A, EU-ADR group. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2009 Dec 01; 18(12):1176-84. PubMed ID: 19757412 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]