These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

128 related items for PubMed ID: 2027732

  • 1. Computed radiography in neonatal intensive care.
    Merlo L, Bighi S, Cervi PM, Lupi L.
    Pediatr Radiol; 1991; 21(2):94-6. PubMed ID: 2027732
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [Digital radiography in neonatal intensive care].
    Merlo L, Bighi S, Cervi PM, Lupi L, Vita G.
    Radiol Med; 1990 Sep; 80(3):230-3. PubMed ID: 2236678
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Computed radiography in neonatal and pediatric intensive care units: a comparison of 2.5 K x 2 K soft-copy images vs digital hard-copy film.
    Brill PW, Winchester P, Cahill P, Lesser M, Durfee SM, Giess CS, Auld PA, Greenwald B.
    Pediatr Radiol; 1996 Sep; 26(5):333-6. PubMed ID: 8657462
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Reduced radiation dose and improved image quality using a mini mobile digital imaging system in a neonatal intensive care unit.
    Kim TH, Ryu JH, Jeong CW, Jun HY, Heo DW, Lee SH, Oh YK, Lee MJ, Yoon KH.
    Clin Imaging; 2017 Sep; 42():165-171. PubMed ID: 28064140
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. State-of-the-art digital radiography.
    Lee KR, Siegel EL, Templeton AW, Dwyer SJ, Murphey MD, Wetzel LH.
    Radiographics; 1991 Nov; 11(6):1013-25; discussion 1026. PubMed ID: 1749846
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of a PACS workstation with conventional film for interpretation of neonatal examinations: a paired comparison study.
    Franken EA, Smith WL, Berbaum KS, Kao SC, Sato Y.
    Pediatr Radiol; 1991 Nov; 21(5):336-40. PubMed ID: 1891258
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Radiation dose reduction in the neonatal intensive care unit. Comparison of three gadolinium oxysulfide screen-film combinations.
    Smathers RL, Alford BA, Messenger J, Agarwal SK, Taylor TS.
    Invest Radiol; 1984 Nov; 19(6):578-82. PubMed ID: 6511267
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [An economic comparison between digital luminescence radiography and conventional film processing in intensive care medicine].
    Peters PE, Dykstra DE, Wiesmann W, Schlüchtermann J, Adam D.
    Radiologe; 1992 Nov; 32(11):536-40. PubMed ID: 1461981
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Productivity and cost assessment of computed radiography, digital radiography, and screen-film for outpatient chest examinations.
    Andriole KP.
    J Digit Imaging; 2002 Sep; 15(3):161-9. PubMed ID: 12532253
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Feasibility study of a novel portable digital radiography system modified for fluoroscopy in the neonatal intensive care unit.
    Liszewski MC, Richard S, Gross JN, Schonberger A, Levin TL, Blumfield E, Nafday SM, Taragin BH.
    Pediatr Radiol; 2021 Aug; 51(9):1667-1675. PubMed ID: 33738539
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Development of a digital duplication system for portable chest radiographs.
    Hoffmann KR, Doi K, MacMahon H, Giger ML, Nishikawa RM, Xu XW, Yao L, Kano A, Carlin M.
    J Digit Imaging; 1994 Aug; 7(3):146-53. PubMed ID: 7948174
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Digital radiography in paediatrics: radiation dose considerations and magnitude of possible dose reduction.
    Hufton AP, Doyle SM, Carty HM.
    Br J Radiol; 1998 Feb; 71(842):186-99. PubMed ID: 9579183
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Adult fingers visualized on neonatal intensive care unit chest radiographs: what you don't see.
    Russell J, Burbridge BE, Duncan MD, Tynan J.
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2013 Aug; 64(3):236-9. PubMed ID: 22884228
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Radiation Exposure in the NICU: Computed Radiography versus Digital Detector Radiography.
    Oberle R.
    Radiol Manage; 2015 Aug; 37(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 26710555
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Evaluation of a digital workstation for interpreting neonatal examinations. A receiver operating characteristic study.
    Franken EA, Berbaum KS, Marley SM, Smith WL, Sato Y, Kao SC, Milam SG.
    Invest Radiol; 1992 Sep; 27(9):732-7. PubMed ID: 1399457
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
    Bacher K, Smeets P, Bonnarens K, De Hauwere A, Verstraete K, Thierens H.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Phosphor plate computed radiography: response to variation in mAs at fixed kVp in an animal model. Potential role in neonatal imaging.
    Broderick NJ, Long B, Dreesen RG, Cohen MD, Cory DA, Katz BP, Kalasinski LA.
    Clin Radiol; 1993 Jan; 47(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 8428416
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Portable chest radiography techniques and teleradiology.
    MacMahon H, Giger M.
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1996 Jan; 34(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 8539346
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Use of computed radiography in respiratory distress syndrome in the neonatal nursery.
    Nakano Y, Odagiri K.
    Pediatr Radiol; 1989 Jan; 19(3):167-8. PubMed ID: 2717250
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [Series: Practical Evaluation of Clinical Image Quality (4): Determination of Image Quality in Digital Radiography System].
    Katayama R.
    Igaku Butsuri; 2016 Jan; 36(3):166-172. PubMed ID: 28442655
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.