These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

159 related items for PubMed ID: 20308525

  • 1. Recommendation for short-interval follow-up examinations after a probably benign assessment: is clinical practice consistent with BI-RADS guidance?
    Bowles EJ, Sickles EA, Miglioretti DL, Carney PA, Elmore JG.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Apr; 194(4):1152-9. PubMed ID: 20308525
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Use of the American College of Radiology BI-RADS guidelines by community radiologists: concordance of assessments and recommendations assigned to screening mammograms.
    Lehman C, Holt S, Peacock S, White E, Urban N.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Jul; 179(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 12076896
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Use of BI-RADS 3-probably benign category in the American College of Radiology Imaging Network Digital Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial.
    Baum JK, Hanna LG, Acharyya S, Mahoney MC, Conant EF, Bassett LW, Pisano ED.
    Radiology; 2011 Jul; 260(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 21502382
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Effect of radiologists' diagnostic work-up volume on interpretive performance.
    Buist DS, Anderson ML, Smith RA, Carney PA, Miglioretti DL, Monsees BS, Sickles EA, Taplin SH, Geller BM, Yankaskas BC, Onega TL.
    Radiology; 2014 Nov; 273(2):351-64. PubMed ID: 24960110
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Coding mammograms using the classification "probably benign finding--short interval follow-up suggested".
    Caplan LS, Blackman D, Nadel M, Monticciolo DL.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Feb; 172(2):339-42. PubMed ID: 9930778
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Does litigation influence medical practice? The influence of community radiologists' medical malpractice perceptions and experience on screening mammography.
    Elmore JG, Taplin SH, Barlow WE, Cutter GR, D'Orsi CJ, Hendrick RE, Abraham LA, Fosse JS, Carney PA.
    Radiology; 2005 Jul; 236(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 15987961
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Accuracy of short-interval follow-up mammograms by patient and radiologist characteristics.
    Aiello Bowles EJ, Miglioretti DL, Sickles EA, Abraham L, Carney PA, Yankaskas BC, Elmore JG.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 May; 190(5):1200-8. PubMed ID: 18430832
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Are there racial/ethnic disparities among women younger than 40 undergoing mammography?
    Kapp JM, Walker R, Haneuse S, Buist DS, Yankaskas BC.
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Nov; 124(1):213-22. PubMed ID: 20204501
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Breast MRI BI-RADS assessments and abnormal interpretation rates by clinical indication in US community practices.
    Lee CI, Ichikawa L, Rochelle MC, Kerlikowske K, Miglioretti DL, Sprague BL, DeMartini WB, Wernli KJ, Joe BN, Yankaskas BC, Lehman CD.
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Nov; 21(11):1370-6. PubMed ID: 25126973
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Breast cancer yield for screening mammographic examinations with recommendation for short-interval follow-up.
    Kerlikowske K, Smith-Bindman R, Abraham LA, Lehman CD, Yankaskas BC, Ballard-Barbash R, Barlow WE, Voeks JH, Geller BM, Carney PA, Sickles EA.
    Radiology; 2005 Mar; 234(3):684-92. PubMed ID: 15734926
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Patient and Radiologist Characteristics Associated With Accuracy of Two Types of Diagnostic Mammograms.
    Jackson SL, Abraham L, Miglioretti DL, Buist DS, Kerlikowske K, Onega T, Carney PA, Sickles EA, Elmore JG.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Aug; 205(2):456-63. PubMed ID: 26204300
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Radiologist characteristics associated with interpretive performance of diagnostic mammography.
    Miglioretti DL, Smith-Bindman R, Abraham L, Brenner RJ, Carney PA, Bowles EJ, Buist DS, Elmore JG.
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Dec 19; 99(24):1854-63. PubMed ID: 18073379
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Lesion and patient characteristics associated with malignancy after a probably benign finding on community practice mammography.
    Lehman CD, Rutter CM, Eby PR, White E, Buist DS, Taplin SH.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Feb 19; 190(2):511-5. PubMed ID: 18212240
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Positive predictive value of mammography: comparison of interpretations of screening and diagnostic images by the same radiologist and by different radiologists.
    Halladay JR, Yankaskas BC, Bowling JM, Alexander C.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Sep 19; 195(3):782-5. PubMed ID: 20729460
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.