These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

275 related items for PubMed ID: 2031893

  • 1. Attitudes towards gamete donation among couples undergoing in vitro fertilization.
    Oskarsson T, Dimitry ES, Mills MS, Hunt J, Winston RM.
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1991 Apr; 98(4):351-6. PubMed ID: 2031893
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Gamete donation and anonymity.
    Templeton A.
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1991 Apr; 98(4):343-5. PubMed ID: 2031890
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Attitudes about donor information differ greatly between IVF couples using their own gametes and those receiving or donating oocytes or sperm.
    Svanberg AS, Sydsjö G, Bladh M, Lampic C.
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2016 Jun; 33(6):703-10. PubMed ID: 27059774
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Attitudes of donors and recipients to gamete donation.
    Robinson JN, Forman RG, Clark AM, Egan DM, Chapman MG, Barlow DH.
    Hum Reprod; 1991 Feb; 6(2):307-9. PubMed ID: 2056030
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Investigating psychosocial attitudes, motivations and experiences of oocyte donors, recipients and egg sharers: a systematic review.
    Bracewell-Milnes T, Saso S, Bora S, Ismail AM, Al-Memar M, Hamed AH, Abdalla H, Thum MY.
    Hum Reprod Update; 2016 Jun; 22(4):450-65. PubMed ID: 27016289
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Motivations and attitudes of candidate sperm donors in Belgium.
    Thijssen A, Provoost V, Vandormael E, Dhont N, Pennings G, Ombelet W.
    Fertil Steril; 2017 Sep; 108(3):539-547. PubMed ID: 28865553
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Two decades after legislation on identifiable donors in Sweden: are recipient couples ready to be open about using gamete donation?
    Isaksson S, Skoog Svanberg A, Sydsjö G, Thurin-Kjellberg A, Karlström PO, Solensten NG, Lampic C.
    Hum Reprod; 2011 Apr; 26(4):853-60. PubMed ID: 21212053
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Sperm donors: their attitudes toward providing medical and psychosocial information for recipient couples and donor offspring.
    Mahlstedt PP, Probasco KA.
    Fertil Steril; 1991 Oct; 56(4):747-53. PubMed ID: 1915953
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Attitudes towards disclosure and relationship to donor offspring among a national cohort of identity-release oocyte and sperm donors.
    Lampic C, Skoog Svanberg A, Sydsjö G.
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Sep; 29(9):1978-86. PubMed ID: 25030191
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Attitudes of parents of young children to sperm donation--implications for donor recruitment.
    Purdie A, Peek JC, Adair V, Graham F, Fisher R.
    Hum Reprod; 1994 Jul; 9(7):1355-8. PubMed ID: 7962448
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. All in the family: social processes in ovarian egg donation between sisters.
    Lessor R.
    Sociol Health Illn; 1993 Jun; 15(3):393-413. PubMed ID: 11659696
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Creating brave new families with advanced reproductive technologies.
    Braverman AM, English ME.
    NAACOGS Clin Issu Perinat Womens Health Nurs; 1992 Jun; 3(2):353-63. PubMed ID: 1596443
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Motivation, attitudes and experience of donation: a follow-up of women donating eggs in assisted conception treatment.
    Fielding D, Handley S, Duqueno L, Weaver S, Lui S.
    J Community Appl Soc Psychol; 1998 Jun; 8(4):273-87. PubMed ID: 15452938
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Oocyte donation: particular technical and ethical aspects.
    Englert Y, Govaerts I.
    Hum Reprod; 1998 May; 13 Suppl 2():90-7. PubMed ID: 9665329
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Counselling couples and donors for oocyte donation: the decision to use either known or anonymous oocytes.
    Baetens P, Devroey P, Camus M, Van Steirteghem AC, Ponjaert-Kristoffersen I.
    Hum Reprod; 2000 Feb; 15(2):476-84. PubMed ID: 10655327
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Disclosure behaviour and intentions among 111 couples following treatment with oocytes or sperm from identity-release donors: follow-up at offspring age 1-4 years.
    Isaksson S, Sydsjö G, Skoog Svanberg A, Lampic C.
    Hum Reprod; 2012 Oct; 27(10):2998-3007. PubMed ID: 22859508
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Preferences and needs regarding future contact with donation offspring among identity-release gamete donors: results from the Swedish Study on Gamete Donation.
    Isaksson S, Sydsjö G, Skoog Svanberg A, Lampic C.
    Fertil Steril; 2014 Oct; 102(4):1160-6. PubMed ID: 25123638
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Survey of attitudes regarding the use of siblings for gamete donation.
    Sauer MV, Rodi IA, Scrooc M, Bustillo M, Buster JE.
    Fertil Steril; 1988 Apr; 49(4):721-2. PubMed ID: 3350167
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Privacy and disclosure: the psychological impact on gamete donors and recipients in assisted reproduction.
    Weil E.
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 1997 Aug; 14(7):369-71. PubMed ID: 9285316
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The controversy surrounding privacy or disclosure among donor gamete recipients.
    Klock SC.
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 1997 Aug; 14(7):378-80. PubMed ID: 9285320
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.