These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. The effectiveness of pendulum, K-loop, and distal jet distalization techniques in growing children and its effects on anchor unit: A comparative study. Marure PS, Patil RU, Reddy S, Prakash A, Kshetrimayum N, Shukla R. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2016 Feb; 34(4):331-40. PubMed ID: 27681396 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A cephalometric study to compare the effects of cervical traction and Andresen therapy in the treatment of class II division 1 malocclusion. Part 2--Dentoalveolar changes. Derringer K. Br J Orthod; 1990 May; 17(2):89-99. PubMed ID: 2357464 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of zigzag elastics in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion subjects with hypo- and hyperdivergent growth patterns. A pilot study. Aras A, Cinsar A, Bulut H. Eur J Orthod; 2001 Aug; 23(4):393-402. PubMed ID: 11544789 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-term stability of Angle Class II, division 1 malocclusions with successful occlusal results at end of active treatment. Fidler BC, Artun J, Joondeph DR, Little RM. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Mar; 107(3):276-85. PubMed ID: 7879760 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of maxillary molar distalization with the distal jet: a comparison with other contemporary methods. Bolla E, Muratore F, Carano A, Bowman SJ. Angle Orthod; 2002 Oct; 72(5):481-94. PubMed ID: 12401059 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Forsus Nitinol Flat Spring and Jasper Jumper corrections of Class II division 1 malocclusions. Karacay S, Akin E, Olmez H, Gurton AU, Sagdic D. Angle Orthod; 2006 Jul; 76(4):666-72. PubMed ID: 16808575 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Mandibular incisor position changes in relation to amount of bite jumping during Herbst/multibracket appliance treatment: a radiographic-cephalometric study. Martin J, Pancherz H. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 19577147 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of two contrasting forms of orthodontic treatment on the facial profile. Looi LK, Mills JR. Am J Orthod; 1986 Jun; 89(6):507-17. PubMed ID: 3459364 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]