These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

156 related items for PubMed ID: 20329849

  • 1. Multicenter evaluation of signal enhancement algorithms for hearing aids.
    Luts H, Eneman K, Wouters J, Schulte M, Vormann M, Buechler M, Dillier N, Houben R, Dreschler WA, Froehlich M, Puder H, Grimm G, Hohmann V, Leijon A, Lombard A, Mauler D, Spriet A.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Mar; 127(3):1491-505. PubMed ID: 20329849
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.
    Zekveld AA, Kramer SE, Festen JM.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Speech understanding in background noise with the two-microphone adaptive beamformer BEAM in the Nucleus Freedom Cochlear Implant System.
    Spriet A, Van Deun L, Eftaxiadis K, Laneau J, Moonen M, van Dijk B, van Wieringen A, Wouters J.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):62-72. PubMed ID: 17204899
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Improvement in speech intelligibility in noise employing an adaptive filter with normal and hearing-impaired subjects.
    Brey RH, Robinette MS, Chabries DM, Christiansen RW.
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987 Feb; 24(4):75-86. PubMed ID: 3430392
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Real-time multiband dynamic compression and noise reduction for binaural hearing aids.
    Kollmeier B, Peissig J, Hohmann V.
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993 Feb; 30(1):82-94. PubMed ID: 8263832
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Development of the Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences Test (LISN-S).
    Cameron S, Dillon H.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):196-211. PubMed ID: 17496671
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Using genetic algorithms with subjective input from human subjects: implications for fitting hearing aids and cochlear implants.
    Başkent D, Eiler CL, Edwards B.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):370-80. PubMed ID: 17485986
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Speech intelligibility improvements with hearing aids using bilateral and binaural adaptive multichannel Wiener filtering based noise reduction.
    Cornelis B, Moonen M, Wouters J.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jun; 131(6):4743-55. PubMed ID: 22712947
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Evaluation of model-based versus non-parametric monaural noise-reduction approaches for hearing aids.
    Harlander N, Rosenkranz T, Hohmann V.
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Aug; 51(8):627-39. PubMed ID: 22642311
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Perceptual effects of noise reduction with respect to personal preference, speech intelligibility, and listening effort.
    Brons I, Houben R, Dreschler WA.
    Ear Hear; 2013 Aug; 34(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 22874643
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effect of slow-acting wide dynamic range compression on measures of intelligibility and ratings of speech quality in simulated-loss listeners.
    Rosengard PS, Payton KL, Braida LD.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):702-14. PubMed ID: 16197282
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Evaluation of the sparse coding shrinkage noise reduction algorithm in normal hearing and hearing impaired listeners.
    Sang J, Hu H, Zheng C, Li G, Lutman ME, Bleeck S.
    Hear Res; 2014 Apr; 310():36-47. PubMed ID: 24495441
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Digital signal processing (DSP) applications for multiband loudness correction digital hearing aids and cochlear implants.
    Dillier N, Frölich T, Kompis M, Bögli H, Lai WK.
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993 Apr; 30(1):95-109. PubMed ID: 8263833
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Binaural noise-reduction hearing aid scheme with real-time processing in the frequency domain.
    Kollmeier B, Peissig J, Hohmann V.
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993 Apr; 38():28-38. PubMed ID: 8153562
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Speech discrimination with an 8-channel compression hearing aid and conventional aids in background of speech-band noise.
    Yund EW, Simon HJ, Efron R.
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987 Apr; 24(4):161-80. PubMed ID: 3430375
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C, Manrique M, Ramos A, Garcia-Ibanez L, Cavalle L, Huarte A, Castillo C, Estrada E.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. An investigation of input level range for the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: speech perception performance, program preference, and loudness comfort ratings.
    James CJ, Skinner MW, Martin LF, Holden LK, Galvin KL, Holden TA, Whitford L.
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):157-74. PubMed ID: 12677112
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Effects of transient noise reduction algorithms on speech intelligibility and ratings of hearing aid users.
    DiGiovanni JJ, Davlin EA, Nagaraj NK.
    Am J Audiol; 2011 Dec; 20(2):140-50. PubMed ID: 21940982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Speech enhancement with multichannel Wiener filter techniques in multimicrophone binaural hearing aids.
    Van den Bogaert T, Doclo S, Wouters J, Moonen M.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jan; 125(1):360-71. PubMed ID: 19173423
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Application of adaptive digital signal processing to speech enhancement for the hearing impaired.
    Chabries DM, Christiansen RW, Brey RH, Robinette MS, Harris RW.
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987 Jan; 24(4):65-74. PubMed ID: 3430391
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.