These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

172 related items for PubMed ID: 2033550

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Retention and resistance features for complex amalgam restorations.
    Robbins JW, Burgess JO, Summitt JB.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1989 Apr; 118(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 2651502
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Slots vs pins: a comparison of retention under simulated chewing stresses.
    Outhwaite WC, Twiggs SW, Fairhurst CW, King GE.
    J Dent Res; 1982 Feb; 61(2):400-2. PubMed ID: 6948858
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A review of the amalgapin technique for complex amalgam restorations.
    Eberting JJ.
    Gen Dent; 2000 Feb; 48(1):92-5. PubMed ID: 11199563
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The performance of bonded vs. pin-retained complex amalgam restorations: a five-year clinical evaluation.
    Summitt JB, Burgess JO, Berry TG, Robbins JW, Osborne JW, Haveman CW.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Jul; 132(7):923-31. PubMed ID: 11480646
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Effect of distribution of resistance features in complex amalgam restorations.
    Summitt JB, Rindler EA, Robbins JW, Burgess JO.
    Oper Dent; 1994 Jul; 19(2):53-8. PubMed ID: 8008611
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Proximal Contact Repair of Complex Amalgam Restorations.
    Zguri MN, Casey JA, Jessup JP, Vandewalle KS.
    Oper Dent; 2017 Jul; 42(3):266-272. PubMed ID: 28080293
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Six-year clinical evaluation of bonded and pin-retained complex amalgam restorations.
    Summitt JB, Burgess JO, Berry TG, Robbins JW, Osborne JW, Haveman CW.
    Oper Dent; 2004 Jul; 29(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 15195725
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Fracture strength of amalgam crowns with repaired endodontic access.
    Hachmeister KA, Dunn WJ, Murchison DF, Larsen RB.
    Oper Dent; 2002 Jul; 27(3):254-8. PubMed ID: 12022456
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of resistance features for complex amalgam restorations.
    Summitt JB, Burgess JO, Kaiser DA, Rux HW, Dutton FB.
    Am J Dent; 1991 Dec; 4(6):268-72. PubMed ID: 1814348
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Cavity design and marginal degradation of the occlusal part of Class-II amalgam restorations.
    Jokstad A, Mjör IA.
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1990 Dec; 48(6):389-97. PubMed ID: 2288211
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The effect of slot preparation length on the transverse strength of slot-retained restorations.
    McMaster DR, House RC, Anderson MH, Pelleu GB.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Apr; 67(4):472-7. PubMed ID: 1507128
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The retentive strength of slots with different width and depth versus pins.
    Chan CC, Chan KC.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1987 Nov; 58(5):552-7. PubMed ID: 3479552
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.